MGC vs. USMV
MGC (Vanguard Mega Cap ETF) and USMV (iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - MGC tracks the CRSP US Mega Cap Index while USMV tracks the MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MGC returned 15.94%/yr vs 9.48%/yr for USMV. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MGC charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USMV.
Performance
MGC vs. USMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGC achieves a 10.28% return, which is significantly higher than USMV's 3.64% return. Over the past 10 years, MGC has outperformed USMV with an annualized return of 15.94%, while USMV has yielded a comparatively lower 9.48% annualized return.
MGC
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 1.71%
- 6M
- 8.86%
- YTD
- 10.28%
- 1Y
- 22.50%
- 3Y*
- 21.64%
- 5Y*
- 13.67%
- 10Y*
- 15.94%
USMV
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- 6M
- 3.50%
- YTD
- 3.64%
- 1Y
- 5.50%
- 3Y*
- 11.07%
- 5Y*
- 6.93%
- 10Y*
- 9.48%
MGC vs. USMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 10.28% | 19.31% | 27.16% | 29.77% | -19.95% | 27.58% | 21.57% | 31.14% | -3.45% | 22.61% |
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 3.64% | 7.65% | 15.74% | 10.33% | -9.43% | 20.85% | 5.64% | 27.69% | 1.33% | 18.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between MGC and USMV is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MGC and USMV has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
MGC vs. USMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MGC
USMV
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
MGC
USMV
Communication Services
MGC
USMV
Financial Services
MGC
USMV
Consumer Cyclical
MGC
USMV
Healthcare
MGC
USMV
Industrials
MGC
USMV
Consumer Defensive
MGC
USMV
Energy
MGC
USMV
Basic Materials
MGC
USMV
Real Estate
MGC
USMV
Utilities
MGC
USMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MGC vs. USMV — Risk / Return Rank
MGC
USMV
MGC vs. USMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MGC | USMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.11 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.30 | 0.86 | +1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.58 | 2.80 | +6.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MGC vs. USMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGC drawdown since its inception was -52.26%, which is greater than USMV's maximum drawdown of -33.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGC and USMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGC | USMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.26% | -33.10% | -19.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.85% | -6.46% | -3.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.28% | -9.36% | -9.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.74% | -17.93% | -7.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.07% | -33.10% | +0.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.26% | -1.49% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.16% | -2.87% | -4.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.35% | 1.97% | +0.38% |
Volatility
MGC vs. USMV - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF (USMV) at 2.75%. This indicates that MGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MGC | USMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 2.75% | +1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.50% | 6.30% | +4.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.15% | 8.52% | +4.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 12.37% | +5.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.22% | 14.50% | +3.72% |
MGC vs. USMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGC has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than USMV's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MGC vs. USMV - Dividend Comparison
MGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than USMV's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 0.91% | 0.93% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.65% | 1.17% | 1.45% | 1.81% | 2.10% | 1.83% | 2.14% | 2.11% |
USMV iShares MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.49% | 1.49% | 1.67% | 1.82% | 1.62% | 1.26% | 1.81% | 1.88% | 2.12% | 1.77% | 2.22% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MGC and USMV have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MGC has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to USMV (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MGC dropped -52.26% vs USMV's -33.10%.
On 10-year performance, MGC leads with 15.94% vs 9.48% for USMV. On fees, MGC is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, USMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MGC has performed better with a 15.94% return vs 9.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MGC is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for USMV.
USMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 0.91% for MGC.
MGC tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Index, while USMV tracks MSCI USA Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for MGC and 0.15% for USMV.
MGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MGC and USMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer