MGC vs. BDGS
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS).
MGC and BDGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MGC is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Mega Cap Index. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. BDGS is an actively managed fund by Bridges. It was launched on May 10, 2023.
Performance
MGC vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MGC vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | -4.86% | 19.31% | 27.16% | 18.00% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | -0.87% | 10.61% | 19.07% | 8.31% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MGC achieves a -4.86% return, which is significantly lower than BDGS's -0.87% return.
MGC
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- -4.09%
- YTD
- -4.86%
- 6M
- -2.26%
- 1Y
- 18.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.96%
- 5Y*
- 12.41%
- 10Y*
- 14.78%
BDGS
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- -0.87%
- 6M
- 0.57%
- 1Y
- 10.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MGC vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MGC has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MGC vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank
MGC
BDGS
MGC vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MGC | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 1.02 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.56 | 1.72 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.29 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 1.90 | -0.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.19 | 9.84 | -2.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MGC | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 1.02 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 1.54 | -0.98 |
Correlation
The correlation between MGC and BDGS is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
MGC vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison
MGC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than BDGS's 0.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MGC Vanguard Mega Cap ETF | 1.01% | 0.93% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.65% | 1.17% | 1.45% | 1.81% | 2.10% | 1.83% | 2.14% | 2.11% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 0.56% | 0.55% | 1.81% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MGC vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MGC drawdown since its inception was -51.93%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MGC and BDGS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MGC | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.93% | -9.12% | -42.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.93% | -5.85% | -6.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.74% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.33% | -1.61% | -4.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.12% | -0.67% | -6.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 1.13% | +1.59% |
Volatility
MGC vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) has a higher volatility of 5.54% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 3.45%. This indicates that MGC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MGC | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.54% | 3.45% | +2.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.86% | 5.12% | +4.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.80% | 10.72% | +8.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.26% | 8.35% | +8.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 8.35% | +9.84% |