MFVL vs. GCOW

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) and GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. MFVL is actively managed, while GCOW is passively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MFVL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GCOW.

Performance

MFVL vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFVL achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 12.18% return.

MFVL

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: 0.90%
• YTD: 0.39%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GCOW

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 0.09%
• YTD: 12.18%
• 6M: 13.23%
• 1Y: 27.12%
• 3Y*: 17.41%
• 5Y*: 12.34%
• 10Y*: 9.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFVL vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	0.39%	1.39%
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	12.18%	2.23%

Correlation

The correlation between MFVL and GCOW is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025	0.30

Return for Risk

MFVL vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCOW

GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 79
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 72
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFVL vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MFVL	GCOW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.61	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	0.59	-0.28

Drawdowns

MFVL vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFVL drawdown since its inception was -7.03%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFVL and GCOW.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFVL	GCOW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.03%	-37.64%	+30.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-4.77%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.35%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.48%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.29%	-2.73%	-0.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.42%	-5.84%	+3.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.81%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MFVL	GCOW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.85%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.99%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.15%	10.81%	+1.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.15%	13.49%	-1.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.15%	16.20%	-4.05%

MFVL vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFVL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

MFVL vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	4.43%	4.06%	5.14%	5.28%	4.39%	4.23%	4.12%	4.40%	3.94%	2.79%	1.95%
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MFVL and GCOW in my portfolio?

MFVL and GCOW have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MFVL or GCOW?

On fees, MFVL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MFVL or GCOW?

MFVL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCOW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MFVL or GCOW?

GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.

What is the main difference between MFVL and GCOW?

They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFVL and 0.60% for GCOW.