PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFVL vs. ABEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFVL vs. ABEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) and Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFVL achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than ABEQ's 3.44% return.


MFVL

1D
-1.06%
1M
0.90%
YTD
0.39%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ABEQ

1D
-0.17%
1M
-0.34%
YTD
3.44%
6M
3.43%
1Y
8.87%
3Y*
11.57%
5Y*
7.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFVL vs. ABEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MFVL
Motley Fool Value Factor ETF
0.39%1.39%
ABEQ
Absolute Select Value ETF
3.44%1.02%

Correlation

The correlation between MFVL and ABEQ is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFVL vs. ABEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFVL

ABEQ
ABEQ Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
ABEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ABEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
ABEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
ABEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
ABEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFVL vs. ABEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) and Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MFVL vs. ABEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFVLABEQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.56

-0.25

Drawdowns

MFVL vs. ABEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFVL drawdown since its inception was -7.03%, smaller than the maximum ABEQ drawdown of -27.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFVL and ABEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFVLABEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.03%

-27.82%

+20.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.29%

-7.43%

+4.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.42%

-4.07%

+1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

Volatility

MFVL vs. ABEQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFVLABEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.15%

8.91%

+3.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.15%

10.81%

+1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.15%

13.84%

-1.69%

MFVL vs. ABEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFVL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ABEQ's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFVL vs. ABEQ - Dividend Comparison

MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ABEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ABEQ
Absolute Select Value ETF
1.21%1.25%1.48%2.60%1.20%0.60%0.60%
MFVL
Motley Fool Value Factor ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFVL and ABEQ have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MFVL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MFVL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ABEQ.

ABEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.

They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and Absolute Investment Advisers LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFVL and 0.85% for ABEQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFVL and ABEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer