MFVL vs. ABEQ
MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) and ABEQ (Absolute Select Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MFVL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for ABEQ.
Performance
MFVL vs. ABEQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFVL achieves a 0.39% return, which is significantly lower than ABEQ's 3.44% return.
MFVL
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ABEQ
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- 3.44%
- 6M
- 3.43%
- 1Y
- 8.87%
- 3Y*
- 11.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- —
MFVL vs. ABEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.39% | 1.39% |
ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF | 3.44% | 1.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFVL and ABEQ is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFVL vs. ABEQ — Risk / Return Rank
MFVL
ABEQ
MFVL vs. ABEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) and Absolute Select Value ETF (ABEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFVL | ABEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.56 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
MFVL vs. ABEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFVL drawdown since its inception was -7.03%, smaller than the maximum ABEQ drawdown of -27.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFVL and ABEQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFVL | ABEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -27.82% | +20.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.29% | -7.43% | +4.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -4.07% | +1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.20% | — |
Volatility
MFVL vs. ABEQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFVL | ABEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.69% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.15% | 8.91% | +3.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.15% | 10.81% | +1.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.15% | 13.84% | -1.69% |
MFVL vs. ABEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFVL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than ABEQ's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFVL vs. ABEQ - Dividend Comparison
MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ABEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ABEQ Absolute Select Value ETF | 1.21% | 1.25% | 1.48% | 2.60% | 1.20% | 0.60% | 0.60% |
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFVL and ABEQ have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFVL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFVL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ABEQ.
ABEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.21%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.
They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and Absolute Investment Advisers LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFVL and 0.85% for ABEQ.
Find the right allocation for MFVL and ABEQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer