MFUS vs. VUG
MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) and VUG (Vanguard Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - MFUS tracks the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index while VUG tracks the CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MFUS returned 12.86%/yr vs 15.17%/yr for VUG. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFUS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VUG.
Performance
MFUS vs. VUG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFUS achieves a 16.59% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 9.78% return.
MFUS
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- 16.59%
- 6M
- 16.69%
- 1Y
- 28.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.86%
- 10Y*
- —
VUG
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 5.75%
- YTD
- 9.78%
- 6M
- 8.99%
- 1Y
- 27.72%
- 3Y*
- 26.10%
- 5Y*
- 15.17%
- 10Y*
- 18.25%
MFUS vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 16.59% | 16.02% | 20.17% | 12.19% | -5.82% | 24.10% | 10.64% | 26.17% | -7.30% | 11.20% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 9.78% | 19.40% | 32.69% | 46.83% | -33.16% | 27.35% | 40.25% | 37.03% | -3.32% | 7.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFUS and VUG is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017 | 0.74 |
The correlation between MFUS and VUG shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
MFUS vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MFUS
VUG
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
MFUS
VUG
Healthcare
MFUS
VUG
Industrials
MFUS
VUG
Financial Services
MFUS
VUG
Consumer Cyclical
MFUS
VUG
Consumer Defensive
MFUS
VUG
Energy
MFUS
VUG
Communication Services
MFUS
VUG
Basic Materials
MFUS
VUG
Real Estate
MFUS
VUG
Utilities
MFUS
VUG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFUS vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank
MFUS
VUG
MFUS vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFUS | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.31 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.51 | 1.68 | +2.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.52 | 5.90 | +12.63 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFUS | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69 | 1.76 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.69 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.62 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
MFUS vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFUS drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFUS and VUG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFUS | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.21% | -50.68% | +15.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.39% | -16.53% | +10.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.39% | -22.85% | +7.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.22% | -35.61% | +17.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.25% | +1.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -7.09% | +3.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 4.71% | -3.16% |
Volatility
MFUS vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) is 2.97%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that MFUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFUS | VUG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 3.81% | -0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.22% | 12.11% | -3.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.71% | 15.83% | -5.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 22.21% | -7.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 21.44% | -4.09% |
MFUS vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFUS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFUS vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison
MFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 1.35% | 1.54% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VUG Vanguard Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.41% | 0.47% | 0.58% | 0.70% | 0.48% | 0.66% | 0.95% | 1.32% | 1.14% | 1.39% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFUS and VUG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VUG has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to MFUS (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFUS dropped -35.21% vs VUG's -50.68%.
On 5-year performance, VUG leads with 15.17% vs 12.86% for MFUS. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, MFUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VUG has performed better with a 15.17% return vs 12.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MFUS.
MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.37% for VUG.
MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for MFUS and 0.03% for VUG.
MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFUS and VUG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer