PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFUS vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFUS vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFUS achieves a 16.59% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 9.78% return.


MFUS

1D
0.19%
1M
4.47%
YTD
16.59%
6M
16.69%
1Y
28.65%
3Y*
22.52%
5Y*
12.86%
10Y*

VUG

1D
0.26%
1M
5.75%
YTD
9.78%
6M
8.99%
1Y
27.72%
3Y*
26.10%
5Y*
15.17%
10Y*
18.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFUS vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
16.59%16.02%20.17%12.19%-5.82%24.10%10.64%26.17%-7.30%11.20%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
9.78%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%37.03%-3.32%7.49%

Correlation

The correlation between MFUS and VUG is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017

0.74

The correlation between MFUS and VUG shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MFUS vs. VUG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MFUS
VUG

Technology

21.8%
53.5%

Healthcare

13.5%
4.6%

Industrials

12.6%
3.6%

Financial Services

12.6%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

10.3%
1.5%

Energy

7.0%
0.4%

Communication Services

5.3%
17.3%

Basic Materials

2.8%
0.6%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.0%

Utilities

1.7%
0.9%

Technology

MFUS
21.8%
VUG
53.5%

Healthcare

MFUS
13.5%
VUG
4.6%

Industrials

MFUS
12.6%
VUG
3.6%

Financial Services

MFUS
12.6%
VUG
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

MFUS
10.6%
VUG
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

MFUS
10.3%
VUG
1.5%

Energy

MFUS
7.0%
VUG
0.4%

Communication Services

MFUS
5.3%
VUG
17.3%

Basic Materials

MFUS
2.8%
VUG
0.6%

Real Estate

MFUS
1.8%
VUG
1.0%

Utilities

MFUS
1.7%
VUG
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFUS vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFUS
MFUS Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
MFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFUS vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MFUSVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.31

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.51

1.68

+2.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.52

5.90

+12.63

MFUS vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFUS and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MFUSVUGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69

1.76

+0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.69

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.62

+0.17

Drawdowns

MFUS vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFUS drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFUS and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFUSVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.21%

-50.68%

+15.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.39%

-16.53%

+10.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.39%

-22.85%

+7.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.22%

-35.61%

+17.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.25%

+1.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.99%

-7.09%

+3.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

4.71%

-3.16%

Volatility

MFUS vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) is 2.97%, while Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) has a volatility of 3.81%. This indicates that MFUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFUSVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.97%

3.81%

-0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.22%

12.11%

-3.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.71%

15.83%

-5.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.03%

22.21%

-7.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.35%

21.44%

-4.09%

MFUS vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFUS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFUS vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

MFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than VUG's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
1.35%1.54%1.45%1.96%2.07%1.35%1.72%1.89%1.69%1.01%0.00%0.00%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.37%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


MFUS and VUG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VUG has higher volatility (3.81%) compared to MFUS (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFUS dropped -35.21% vs VUG's -50.68%.

On 5-year performance, VUG leads with 15.17% vs 12.86% for MFUS. On fees, VUG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, MFUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VUG has performed better with a 15.17% return vs 12.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VUG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MFUS.

MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.37% for VUG.

MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index​, while VUG tracks CRSP US Large Cap Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for MFUS and 0.03% for VUG.

MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFUS and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer