MFUS vs. TDVG

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) and TDVG (T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. MFUS is passively managed, while TDVG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, MFUS returned 12.96%/yr vs 10.13%/yr for TDVG. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MFUS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for TDVG.

Performance

MFUS vs. TDVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFUS achieves a 17.04% return, which is significantly higher than TDVG's 8.26% return.

MFUS

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 2.36%
• YTD: 17.04%
• 6M: 15.74%
• 1Y: 26.63%
• 3Y*: 21.86%
• 5Y*: 12.96%
• 10Y*: —

TDVG

• 1D: 0.21%
• 1M: 1.43%
• YTD: 8.26%
• 6M: 7.09%
• 1Y: 16.92%
• 3Y*: 15.63%
• 5Y*: 10.13%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFUS vs. TDVG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF	17.04%	16.02%	20.17%	12.19%	-5.82%	24.10%	16.12%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	8.26%	14.80%	13.45%	13.95%	-10.15%	26.20%	12.97%

Correlation

The correlation between MFUS and TDVG is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2020	0.90

The correlation between MFUS and TDVG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

MFUS vs. TDVG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MFUS	TDVG
Technology	24.7%	26.2%
Healthcare	13.4%	12.4%
Industrials	12.2%	13.6%
Financial Services	12.0%	19.3%
Consumer Cyclical	10.5%	7.2%
Consumer Defensive	9.7%	6.9%
Energy	6.4%	5.3%
Communication Services	5.1%	1.0%
Basic Materials	2.8%	2.8%
Real Estate	1.7%	1.6%
Utilities	1.6%	3.8%

Return for Risk

MFUS vs. TDVG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFUS

MFUS Risk / Return Rank: 85
MFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
MFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
MFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 81
MFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
MFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 88

TDVG

TDVG Risk / Return Rank: 58
TDVG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
TDVG Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
TDVG Omega Ratio Rank: 56
TDVG Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
TDVG Martin Ratio Rank: 60

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFUS vs. TDVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MFUS	TDVG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	1.75	+0.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.40	2.51	+0.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.31	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.19	2.35	+1.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.01	9.64	+7.37

MFUS vs. TDVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is higher than the TDVG Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFUS and TDVG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MFUS vs. TDVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFUS drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, which is greater than TDVG's maximum drawdown of -19.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFUS and TDVG.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFUS	TDVG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.21%	-19.20%	-16.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.39%	-7.24%	+0.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.39%	-14.02%	-1.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.22%	-19.20%	+0.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.10%	-0.61%	-0.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.98%	-3.72%	-0.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.57%	1.76%	-0.19%

Volatility

MFUS vs. TDVG - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF (TDVG) at 2.70%. This indicates that MFUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDVG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MFUS	TDVG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.20%	2.70%	+1.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.90%	7.60%	+1.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.21%	9.76%	+1.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.08%	13.92%	+1.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.34%	13.90%	+3.44%

MFUS vs. TDVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFUS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than TDVG's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

MFUS vs. TDVG - Dividend Comparison

MFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than TDVG's 0.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF	1.35%	1.54%	1.45%	1.96%	2.07%	1.35%	1.72%	1.89%	1.69%	1.01%
TDVG T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth ETF	0.98%	1.00%	1.06%	1.31%	1.15%	0.80%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MFUS and TDVG in my portfolio?

MFUS and TDVG have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MFUS or TDVG?

MFUS has higher volatility (4.20%) compared to TDVG (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFUS dropped -35.21% vs TDVG's -19.20%.

Which ETF is better, MFUS or TDVG?

On 5-year performance, MFUS leads with 12.96% vs 10.13% for TDVG. On fees, MFUS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, TDVG has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MFUS or TDVG?

Over the 5-year period, MFUS has performed better with a 12.96% return vs 10.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MFUS or TDVG?

MFUS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TDVG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MFUS or TDVG?

MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.98% for TDVG.

What is the main difference between MFUS and TDVG?

They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and T. Rowe Price. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for MFUS and 0.50% for TDVG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.