MFUS vs. ROUS
MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) and ROUS (Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - MFUS tracks the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index while ROUS tracks the Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MFUS returned 12.86%/yr vs 12.84%/yr for ROUS. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MFUS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ROUS.
Performance
MFUS vs. ROUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with MFUS at 16.59% and ROUS at 16.59%.
MFUS
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- 16.59%
- 6M
- 16.69%
- 1Y
- 28.65%
- 3Y*
- 22.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.86%
- 10Y*
- —
ROUS
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 5.16%
- YTD
- 16.59%
- 6M
- 16.42%
- 1Y
- 29.90%
- 3Y*
- 21.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.84%
- 10Y*
- 12.98%
MFUS vs. ROUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 16.59% | 16.02% | 20.17% | 12.19% | -5.82% | 24.10% | 10.64% | 26.17% | -7.30% | 11.20% |
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 16.59% | 15.21% | 17.61% | 15.05% | -9.65% | 27.33% | 6.61% | 23.94% | -9.59% | 13.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFUS and ROUS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017 | 0.92 |
The correlation between MFUS and ROUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
MFUS vs. ROUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MFUS
ROUS
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
MFUS
ROUS
Healthcare
MFUS
ROUS
Industrials
MFUS
ROUS
Financial Services
MFUS
ROUS
Consumer Cyclical
MFUS
ROUS
Consumer Defensive
MFUS
ROUS
Energy
MFUS
ROUS
Communication Services
MFUS
ROUS
Basic Materials
MFUS
ROUS
Real Estate
MFUS
ROUS
Utilities
MFUS
ROUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFUS vs. ROUS — Risk / Return Rank
MFUS
ROUS
MFUS vs. ROUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFUS | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.47 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.51 | 5.03 | -0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.52 | 20.71 | -2.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFUS | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69 | 2.65 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 0.90 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.67 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
MFUS vs. ROUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFUS drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, roughly equal to the maximum ROUS drawdown of -35.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFUS and ROUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFUS | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.21% | -35.51% | +0.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.39% | -5.97% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.39% | -15.81% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.22% | -18.91% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -4.24% | +0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.55% | 1.45% | +0.10% |
Volatility
MFUS vs. ROUS - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF (ROUS) at 2.44%. This indicates that MFUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFUS | ROUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 2.44% | +0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.22% | 8.50% | -0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.71% | 11.36% | -0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 14.37% | +0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 16.95% | +0.40% |
MFUS vs. ROUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFUS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ROUS's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFUS vs. ROUS - Dividend Comparison
MFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than ROUS's 1.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF | 1.35% | 1.54% | 1.45% | 1.96% | 2.07% | 1.35% | 1.72% | 1.89% | 1.69% | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROUS Hartford Multifactor US Equity ETF | 1.32% | 1.52% | 1.62% | 1.91% | 1.88% | 1.38% | 2.01% | 2.12% | 1.89% | 1.54% | 1.97% | 1.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, MFUS and ROUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MFUS has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to ROUS (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFUS dropped -35.21% vs ROUS's -35.51%.
On 5-year performance, MFUS leads with 12.86% vs 12.84% for ROUS. On fees, ROUS is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ROUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MFUS has performed better with a 12.86% return vs 12.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ROUS is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for MFUS.
MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 1.32% for ROUS.
MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index, while ROUS tracks Hartford Multi-factor Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for MFUS and 0.19% for ROUS.
MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFUS and ROUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer