MFUS vs. BBHL

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

MFUS (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF) and BBHL (BBH Select Large Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - MFUS tracks the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index​ while BBHL tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFUS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.71%/yr for BBHL.

Performance

MFUS vs. BBHL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and BBH Select Large Cap ETF (BBHL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFUS achieves a 16.59% return, which is significantly higher than BBHL's 6.39% return.

MFUS

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 4.47%
• YTD: 16.59%
• 6M: 16.69%
• 1Y: 28.65%
• 3Y*: 22.52%
• 5Y*: 12.86%
• 10Y*: —

BBHL

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 4.01%
• YTD: 6.39%
• 6M: 6.61%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFUS vs. BBHL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF	16.59%	3.65%
BBHL BBH Select Large Cap ETF	6.39%	2.72%

Correlation

The correlation between MFUS and BBHL is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	0.75

Return for Risk

MFUS vs. BBHL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFUS

MFUS Risk / Return Rank: 84
MFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
MFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
MFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 81
MFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
MFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFUS vs. BBHL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) and BBH Select Large Cap ETF (BBHL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MFUS	BBHL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.69	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.85	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.51	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.52	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MFUS	BBHL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.69	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	1.41	-0.62

Drawdowns

MFUS vs. BBHL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFUS drawdown since its inception was -35.21%, which is greater than BBHL's maximum drawdown of -11.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFUS and BBHL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFUS	BBHL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.21%	-11.99%	-23.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.22%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.99%	-2.98%	-1.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.55%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MFUS	BBHL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.97%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.22%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.71%	12.71%	-2.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.03%	12.71%	+2.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.35%	12.71%	+4.64%

MFUS vs. BBHL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFUS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BBHL's 0.71% expense ratio.

Dividends

MFUS vs. BBHL - Dividend Comparison

MFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, while BBHL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BBHL BBH Select Large Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MFUS PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF	1.35%	1.54%	1.45%	1.96%	2.07%	1.35%	1.72%	1.89%	1.69%	1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MFUS and BBHL in my portfolio?

MFUS and BBHL have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MFUS or BBHL?

On fees, MFUS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MFUS or BBHL?

MFUS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.71% for BBHL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MFUS or BBHL?

MFUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.00% for BBHL.

What is the main difference between MFUS and BBHL?

MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index​, while BBHL tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and BBH. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for MFUS and 0.71% for BBHL.