MFMO vs. VAMO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MFMO (Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF) and VAMO (Cambria Value and Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MFMO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for VAMO.

Performance

MFMO vs. VAMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF (MFMO) and Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFMO achieves a 25.49% return, which is significantly higher than VAMO's 3.15% return.

MFMO

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 11.78%
• YTD: 25.49%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VAMO

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -1.08%
• YTD: 3.15%
• 6M: 4.57%
• 1Y: 18.13%
• 3Y*: 13.91%
• 5Y*: 8.12%
• 10Y*: 5.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFMO vs. VAMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MFMO Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF	25.49%	-1.90%
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF	3.15%	0.53%

Correlation

The correlation between MFMO and VAMO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025	0.47

Return for Risk

MFMO vs. VAMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VAMO

VAMO Risk / Return Rank: 52
VAMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
VAMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
VAMO Omega Ratio Rank: 44
VAMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
VAMO Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFMO vs. VAMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF (MFMO) and Cambria Value and Momentum ETF (VAMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MFMO	VAMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.47	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.31	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.24	0.24	+2.00

Drawdowns

MFMO vs. VAMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFMO drawdown since its inception was -12.05%, smaller than the maximum VAMO drawdown of -41.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFMO and VAMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFMO	VAMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.05%	-41.84%	+29.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.55%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.61%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-17.25%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.76%	+2.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.42%	-9.98%	+7.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.92%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MFMO	VAMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.97%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	7.66%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.50%	11.19%	+13.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.50%	17.34%	+7.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.50%	18.09%	+6.41%

MFMO vs. VAMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFMO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than VAMO's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

MFMO vs. VAMO - Dividend Comparison

MFMO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VAMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MFMO Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VAMO Cambria Value and Momentum ETF	0.63%	1.41%	0.84%	1.35%	1.10%	1.07%	1.03%	1.15%	1.03%	0.35%	0.56%	0.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MFMO and VAMO in my portfolio?

MFMO and VAMO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MFMO or VAMO?

On fees, MFMO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MFMO or VAMO?

MFMO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for VAMO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MFMO or VAMO?

VAMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for MFMO.

What is the main difference between MFMO and VAMO?

They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFMO and 0.65% for VAMO.