MFMO vs. USVM
MFMO (Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF) and USVM (VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds. MFMO is actively managed, while USVM is passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFMO charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for USVM.
Performance
MFMO vs. USVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFMO achieves a 16.72% return, which is significantly lower than USVM's 22.25% return.
MFMO
- 1D
- -3.50%
- 1M
- -5.53%
- 6M
- 12.59%
- YTD
- 16.72%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USVM
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 3.19%
- 6M
- 14.82%
- YTD
- 22.25%
- 1Y
- 34.36%
- 3Y*
- 19.69%
- 5Y*
- 12.16%
- 10Y*
- —
MFMO vs. USVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MFMO Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF | 16.72% | -1.80% |
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 22.25% | 0.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFMO and USVM is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFMO vs. USVM — Risk / Return Rank
MFMO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USVM
MFMO vs. USVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF (MFMO) and VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF (USVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFMO | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.13 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.64 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFMO vs. USVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFMO drawdown since its inception was -12.05%, smaller than the maximum USVM drawdown of -42.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFMO and USVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFMO | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.05% | -42.38% | +30.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -24.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.74% | 0.00% | -10.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.71% | -7.80% | +5.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.20% | — |
Volatility
MFMO vs. USVM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFMO | USVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.08% | 14.67% | +13.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.08% | 19.55% | +8.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.08% | 21.90% | +6.18% |
MFMO vs. USVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFMO has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than USVM's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFMO vs. USVM - Dividend Comparison
MFMO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFMO Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USVM VictoryShares US Small Mid Cap Value Momentum ETF | 1.80% | 1.84% | 1.75% | 1.63% | 1.43% | 0.70% | 1.21% | 1.77% | 1.43% | 0.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFMO and USVM have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, USVM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
USVM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MFMO.
USVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.00% for MFMO.
They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFMO and 0.29% for USVM.
Find the right allocation for MFMO and USVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer