MFMO vs. MFVL

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MFMO (Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF) and MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MFMO is a Momentum fund actively managed by Motley Fool, while MFVL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool. Both are actively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

MFMO vs. MFVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF (MFMO) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFMO achieves a 24.60% return, which is significantly higher than MFVL's 1.46% return.

MFMO

• 1D: 1.77%
• 1M: 9.83%
• YTD: 24.60%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MFVL

• 1D: -1.55%
• 1M: 1.07%
• YTD: 1.46%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFMO vs. MFVL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MFMO Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF	24.60%	-1.90%
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	1.46%	1.39%

Correlation

The correlation between MFMO and MFVL is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025	0.29

Return for Risk

MFMO vs. MFVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Momentum Factor ETF (MFMO) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MFMO	MFVL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.16	0.51	+1.65

Drawdowns

MFMO vs. MFVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFMO drawdown since its inception was -12.05%, which is greater than MFVL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFMO and MFVL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFMO	MFVL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-12.05%	-7.03%	-5.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.55%	-2.26%	+1.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.44%	-2.41%	-0.03%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MFMO	MFVL	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.59%	12.10%	+12.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.59%	12.10%	+12.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.59%	12.10%	+12.49%

MFMO vs. MFVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MFMO and MFVL have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

MFMO vs. MFVL - Dividend Comparison

Neither MFMO nor MFVL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MFMO and MFVL in my portfolio?

MFMO and MFVL have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MFMO or MFVL?

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MFMO or MFVL?

MFMO and MFVL have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MFMO or MFVL?

MFMO and MFVL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between MFMO and MFVL?

MFMO is categorized as Momentum, while MFVL is Large Cap Value Equities.