MFIG vs. MEME
MFIG (Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF) and MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. MFIG is passively managed, while MEME is actively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFIG charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for MEME.
Performance
MFIG vs. MEME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFIG achieves a 0.01% return, which is significantly lower than MEME's 49.84% return.
MFIG
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -2.08%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 6M
- -1.62%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MEME
- 1D
- -4.72%
- 1M
- -14.61%
- YTD
- 49.84%
- 6M
- 38.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFIG vs. MEME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MFIG Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF | 0.01% | -0.09% |
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF | 49.84% | -12.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFIG and MEME is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFIG vs. MEME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG) and Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFIG vs. MEME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFIG drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, smaller than the maximum MEME drawdown of -48.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFIG and MEME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFIG | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.29% | -48.78% | +34.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.19% | -21.27% | +15.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.62% | -28.59% | +23.97% |
Volatility
MFIG vs. MEME - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFIG | MEME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.04% | 75.53% | -58.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 75.53% | -58.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.04% | 75.53% | -58.49% |
MFIG vs. MEME - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFIG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than MEME's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFIG vs. MEME - Dividend Comparison
Neither MFIG nor MEME has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
MFIG and MEME have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFIG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFIG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.
MFIG and MEME have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFIG and 0.69% for MEME.
Find the right allocation for MFIG and MEME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer