MFDX vs. PDN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

MFDX (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF) and PDN (Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MFDX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index, while PDN is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE RAFI Developed x US Mid/Small. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MFDX returned 10.45%/yr vs 6.75%/yr for PDN. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. MFDX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for PDN.

Performance

MFDX vs. PDN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF (PDN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFDX achieves a 10.18% return, which is significantly higher than PDN's 9.46% return.

MFDX

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 0.37%
• 6M: 4.44%
• YTD: 10.18%
• 1Y: 22.36%
• 3Y*: 17.13%
• 5Y*: 10.45%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.77%

PDN

• 1D: -1.00%
• 1M: 0.32%
• 6M: 3.05%
• YTD: 9.46%
• 1Y: 21.59%
• 3Y*: 16.30%
• 5Y*: 6.75%
• 10Y*: 8.32%
• ALL TIME*: 5.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF	$1.14M	$830.75K	$740.34K
PDN Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF	$407.49K	$457.49K	$907.00K

MFDX vs. PDN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF	10.18%	34.27%	4.40%	17.54%	-10.27%	11.07%	6.90%	19.88%	-14.88%	7.07%
PDN Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF	9.46%	38.34%	0.57%	13.35%	-17.35%	9.03%	10.65%	19.17%	-18.38%	8.57%

Correlation

The correlation between MFDX and PDN is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2017	0.93

The correlation between MFDX and PDN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

MFDX vs. PDN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MFDX	PDN
Industrials	19.0%	2.5%
Financial Services	15.3%	1.4%
Technology	10.6%	2.1%
Basic Materials	10.2%	2.2%
Consumer Defensive	8.6%	0.6%
Consumer Cyclical	8.0%	1.5%
Healthcare	6.9%	1.0%
Energy	6.4%	1.9%
Communication Services	6.3%	0.3%
Utilities	6.3%	0.8%
Real Estate	2.3%	1.2%

Return for Risk

MFDX vs. PDN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MFDX

MFDX Risk / Return Rank: 67
MFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
MFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
MFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
MFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
MFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

PDN

PDN Risk / Return Rank: 58
PDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
PDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
PDN Omega Ratio Rank: 60
PDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
PDN Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MFDX vs. PDN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF (PDN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MFDX	PDN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	1.40	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	2.03	+0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.26	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.15	1.93	+0.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.19	6.69	+1.50

MFDX vs. PDN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the PDN Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFDX and PDN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MFDX vs. PDN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFDX drawdown since its inception was -36.05%, smaller than the maximum PDN drawdown of -59.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFDX and PDN.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFDX	PDN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.05%	-59.32%	+23.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.66%	-11.26%	+0.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.62%	-12.69%	+1.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.58%	-33.68%	+8.10%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.44%	-3.30%	+1.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.42%	-11.52%	+5.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.79%	3.25%	-0.46%

Volatility

MFDX vs. PDN - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF (PDN) have volatilities of 4.45% and 4.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MFDX	PDN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.45%	4.42%	+0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.48%	13.40%	-0.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.44%	15.50%	-1.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.10%	16.47%	-1.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.40%	16.92%	-0.52%

MFDX vs. PDN - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFDX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than PDN's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

MFDX vs. PDN - Dividend Comparison

MFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than PDN's 3.26% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF	2.91%	2.97%	3.16%	3.12%	2.85%	2.99%	1.58%	2.88%	2.13%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%
PDN Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF	3.26%	3.36%	3.36%	3.16%	2.68%	2.42%	1.79%	2.60%	2.21%	2.42%	2.16%	2.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MFDX and PDN in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, MFDX and PDN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, MFDX or PDN?

MFDX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to PDN (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFDX dropped -36.05% vs PDN's -59.32%.

Which ETF is better, MFDX or PDN?

On 5-year performance, MFDX leads with 10.45% vs 6.75% for PDN. On fees, MFDX is cheaper at 0.39% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MFDX or PDN?

Over the 5-year period, MFDX has performed better with a 10.45% return vs 6.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MFDX or PDN?

MFDX is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for PDN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MFDX or PDN?

PDN has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 2.91% for MFDX.

What is the main difference between MFDX and PDN?

MFDX is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while PDN is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. MFDX tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index, while PDN tracks FTSE RAFI Developed x US Mid/Small. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MFDX and 0.49% for PDN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MFDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.