PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDN vs. PXF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDN vs. PXF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF (PDN) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDN achieves a 9.82% return, which is significantly lower than PXF's 19.33% return. Over the past 10 years, PDN has underperformed PXF with an annualized return of 9.02%, while PXF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.45% annualized return.


PDN

1D
-0.16%
1M
-1.00%
YTD
9.82%
6M
10.25%
1Y
25.89%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
6.89%
10Y*
9.02%

PXF

1D
-0.23%
1M
1.63%
YTD
19.33%
6M
20.38%
1Y
43.30%
3Y*
24.87%
5Y*
13.95%
10Y*
12.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDN vs. PXF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDN
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF
9.82%38.34%0.57%13.35%-17.35%9.03%10.65%19.17%-18.38%30.74%
PXF
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
19.33%42.51%4.54%18.46%-9.09%15.93%2.58%17.50%-14.84%24.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PDN and PXF is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 28, 2007

0.86

The correlation between PDN and PXF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

PDN vs. PXF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PDN
PXF

Industrials

23.2%
14.6%

Financial Services

12.7%
19.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.7%
10.4%

Basic Materials

10.5%
10.1%

Technology

10.1%
14.7%

Real Estate

8.7%
1.6%

Healthcare

5.7%
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.3%
5.7%

Energy

4.8%
9.5%

Communication Services

4.5%
4.3%

Utilities

2.7%
3.2%

Industrials

PDN
23.2%
PXF
14.6%

Financial Services

PDN
12.7%
PXF
19.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PDN
11.7%
PXF
10.4%

Basic Materials

PDN
10.5%
PXF
10.1%

Technology

PDN
10.1%
PXF
14.7%

Real Estate

PDN
8.7%
PXF
1.6%

Healthcare

PDN
5.7%
PXF
6.8%

Consumer Defensive

PDN
5.3%
PXF
5.7%

Energy

PDN
4.8%
PXF
9.5%

Communication Services

PDN
4.5%
PXF
4.3%

Utilities

PDN
2.7%
PXF
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDN vs. PXF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDN
PDN Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDN Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
PDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDN Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

PXF
PXF Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
PXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PXF Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
PXF Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDN vs. PXF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF (PDN) and Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PDNPXFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.49

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

3.99

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.72

14.96

-6.24

PDN vs. PXF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDN Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is lower than the PXF Sharpe Ratio of 2.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDN and PXF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDN vs. PXF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDN drawdown since its inception was -59.32%, smaller than the maximum PXF drawdown of -64.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDN and PXF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDNPXFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.32%

-64.74%

+5.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.26%

-10.91%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.25%

-14.06%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.68%

-26.82%

-6.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.94%

-41.59%

-0.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.98%

-1.60%

-1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.57%

-15.24%

+3.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

2.90%

+0.08%

Volatility

PDN vs. PXF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF (PDN) is 5.26%, while Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF (PXF) has a volatility of 6.34%. This indicates that PDN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDNPXFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

6.34%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.91%

13.97%

-1.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.23%

16.17%

-0.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.44%

16.59%

-0.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.06%

18.03%

-0.97%

PDN vs. PXF - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than PXF's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDN vs. PXF - Dividend Comparison

PDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.04%, which matches PXF's 4.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDN
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF
3.25%3.36%3.36%3.16%2.68%2.42%1.79%2.60%2.21%2.42%2.16%2.06%
PXF
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. ETF
3.08%3.64%3.48%3.55%3.58%3.74%2.11%3.50%3.38%2.78%3.21%3.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, PDN and PXF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PXF has higher volatility (6.34%) compared to PDN (5.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDN dropped -59.32% vs PXF's -64.74%.

On 10-year performance, PXF leads with 12.45% vs 9.02% for PDN. On fees, PXF is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, PDN has been the lower-risk option at 5.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PXF has performed better with a 12.45% return vs 9.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PXF is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for PDN.

PDN has the higher dividend yield at 4.04%, compared with 4.01% for PXF.

PDN is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while PXF is Foreign Large Cap Equities. PDN tracks FTSE RAFI Developed x US Mid/Small, while PXF tracks FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PDN and 0.45% for PXF.

PXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDN and PXF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer