MFDX vs. MUNI
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF (MUNI).
MFDX and MUNI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MFDX is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index. It was launched on Aug 31, 2017. MUNI is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Nov 30, 2009.
Performance
MFDX vs. MUNI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MFDX vs. MUNI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF | 3.63% | 34.27% | 4.40% | 17.54% | -10.27% | 11.07% | 6.90% | 19.88% | -14.88% | 7.02% |
MUNI PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF | 0.11% | 4.72% | 1.43% | 6.07% | -6.62% | 0.67% | 4.83% | 7.09% | 0.84% | 0.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFDX achieves a 3.63% return, which is significantly higher than MUNI's 0.11% return.
MFDX
- 1D
- 3.05%
- 1M
- -7.22%
- YTD
- 3.63%
- 6M
- 8.66%
- 1Y
- 28.57%
- 3Y*
- 16.66%
- 5Y*
- 10.03%
- 10Y*
- —
MUNI
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -1.90%
- YTD
- 0.11%
- 6M
- 1.47%
- 1Y
- 4.63%
- 3Y*
- 3.33%
- 5Y*
- 1.30%
- 10Y*
- 2.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MFDX vs. MUNI - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFDX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than MUNI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MFDX vs. MUNI — Risk / Return Rank
MFDX
MUNI
MFDX vs. MUNI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF (MUNI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFDX | MUNI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.84 | 1.21 | +0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.47 | 1.62 | +0.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.31 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 1.65 | +0.95 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.63 | 5.54 | +5.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFDX | MUNI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 1.21 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 0.40 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.56 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.77 | -0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between MFDX and MUNI is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MFDX vs. MUNI - Dividend Comparison
MFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, less than MUNI's 3.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF | 2.86% | 2.97% | 3.16% | 3.12% | 2.85% | 2.99% | 1.58% | 2.88% | 2.13% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MUNI PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF | 3.28% | 3.26% | 3.50% | 3.09% | 2.13% | 1.62% | 1.92% | 2.44% | 2.38% | 2.37% | 2.37% | 2.20% |
Drawdowns
MFDX vs. MUNI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFDX drawdown since its inception was -36.05%, which is greater than MUNI's maximum drawdown of -11.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFDX and MUNI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFDX | MUNI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.05% | -11.15% | -24.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.66% | -2.93% | -7.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.58% | -11.15% | -14.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -11.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.30% | -1.90% | -5.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.58% | -1.74% | -4.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 0.87% | +1.74% |
Volatility
MFDX vs. MUNI - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF (MUNI) at 1.10%. This indicates that MFDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MUNI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MFDX | MUNI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.29% | 1.10% | +6.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.27% | 1.51% | +8.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.63% | 3.86% | +11.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.95% | 3.30% | +11.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.42% | 3.85% | +12.57% |