PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MUNI vs. PFMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MUNI vs. PFMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF (MUNI) and PIMCO Municipal Bond Fund (PFMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUNI achieves a 1.51% return, which is significantly lower than PFMIX's 1.87% return. Over the past 10 years, MUNI has underperformed PFMIX with an annualized return of 2.12%, while PFMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.84% annualized return.


MUNI

1D
0.13%
1M
1.43%
YTD
1.51%
6M
1.65%
1Y
6.12%
3Y*
3.91%
5Y*
1.29%
10Y*
2.12%

PFMIX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.84%
YTD
1.87%
6M
2.33%
1Y
7.41%
3Y*
5.30%
5Y*
1.46%
10Y*
2.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUNI vs. PFMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MUNI
PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF
1.51%4.72%1.43%6.07%-6.62%0.67%4.83%7.09%0.84%4.86%
PFMIX
PIMCO Municipal Bond Fund
1.87%5.70%3.60%8.04%-11.32%2.55%5.89%8.67%1.41%7.47%

Correlation

The correlation between MUNI and PFMIX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2009

0.55

The correlation between MUNI and PFMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (all time) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MUNI vs. PFMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUNI
MUNI Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
MUNI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUNI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUNI Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
MUNI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUNI Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

PFMIX
PFMIX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PFMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PFMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUNI vs. PFMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF (MUNI) and PIMCO Municipal Bond Fund (PFMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MUNIPFMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.66

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

2.65

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.61

8.86

-0.25

MUNI vs. PFMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUNI Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is comparable to the PFMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUNI and PFMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MUNI vs. PFMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUNI drawdown since its inception was -11.15%, smaller than the maximum PFMIX drawdown of -26.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUNI and PFMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MUNIPFMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.15%

-26.51%

+15.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.29%

-2.82%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.09%

-5.49%

+1.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.15%

-16.11%

+4.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.15%

-16.11%

+4.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-0.38%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.73%

-2.42%

+0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

0.84%

-0.13%

Volatility

MUNI vs. PFMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF (MUNI) is 0.58%, while PIMCO Municipal Bond Fund (PFMIX) has a volatility of 0.84%. This indicates that MUNI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MUNIPFMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.58%

0.84%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.62%

2.07%

-0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23%

2.87%

-0.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.32%

4.15%

-0.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.85%

4.02%

-0.17%

MUNI vs. PFMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUNI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PFMIX's 0.44% expense ratio.


Dividends

MUNI vs. PFMIX - Dividend Comparison

MUNI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than PFMIX's 3.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MUNI
PIMCO Intermediate Municipal Bond Active ETF
3.28%3.26%3.50%3.09%2.13%1.62%1.92%2.44%2.38%2.37%2.37%2.20%
PFMIX
PIMCO Municipal Bond Fund
3.98%5.15%4.73%3.44%2.25%2.13%2.45%3.51%3.77%3.45%3.44%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


MUNI and PFMIX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFMIX has higher volatility (0.84%) compared to MUNI (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUNI dropped -11.15% vs PFMIX's -26.51%.

MUNI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MUNI and PFMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer