MFDX vs. MINT
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT).
MFDX and MINT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MFDX is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index. It was launched on Aug 31, 2017. MINT is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Nov 16, 2009.
Performance
MFDX vs. MINT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MFDX vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF | 3.63% | 34.27% | 4.40% | 17.54% | -10.27% | 11.07% | 6.90% | 19.88% | -14.88% | 7.02% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 0.91% | 4.74% | 5.94% | 6.26% | -1.01% | -0.03% | 1.62% | 3.34% | 1.72% | 0.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFDX achieves a 3.63% return, which is significantly higher than MINT's 0.91% return.
MFDX
- 1D
- 3.05%
- 1M
- -7.22%
- YTD
- 3.63%
- 6M
- 8.66%
- 1Y
- 28.57%
- 3Y*
- 16.66%
- 5Y*
- 10.03%
- 10Y*
- —
MINT
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 2.06%
- 1Y
- 4.54%
- 3Y*
- 5.51%
- 5Y*
- 3.32%
- 10Y*
- 2.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MFDX vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFDX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than MINT's 0.36% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
MFDX vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank
MFDX
MINT
MFDX vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFDX | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.84 | 12.67 | -10.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.47 | 24.74 | -22.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 9.74 | -8.37 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 28.46 | -25.86 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.63 | 234.85 | -224.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFDX | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.84 | 12.67 | -10.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 | 5.75 | -5.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 2.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 2.42 | -1.91 |
Correlation
The correlation between MFDX and MINT is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MFDX vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison
MFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, less than MINT's 4.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF | 2.86% | 2.97% | 3.16% | 3.12% | 2.85% | 2.99% | 1.58% | 2.88% | 2.13% | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF | 4.48% | 4.63% | 5.22% | 4.91% | 1.90% | 0.44% | 1.15% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 1.61% | 1.35% | 0.88% |
Drawdowns
MFDX vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFDX drawdown since its inception was -36.05%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFDX and MINT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFDX | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.05% | -4.62% | -31.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.66% | -0.16% | -10.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.58% | -2.42% | -23.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -4.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.30% | 0.00% | -7.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.58% | -0.17% | -6.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 0.02% | +2.59% |
Volatility
MFDX vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) at 0.08%. This indicates that MFDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MFDX | MINT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.29% | 0.08% | +7.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.27% | 0.18% | +10.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.63% | 0.36% | +15.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.95% | 0.58% | +14.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.42% | 0.95% | +15.47% |