PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
MINT vs. NEAR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between MINT and NEAR is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

MINT vs. NEAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund (MINT) and iShares Short Maturity Bond ETF (NEAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%2.50%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
2.67%
2.74%
MINT
NEAR

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

MINT:

13.40

NEAR:

2.92

Sortino Ratio

MINT:

31.42

NEAR:

4.27

Omega Ratio

MINT:

9.26

NEAR:

1.59

Calmar Ratio

MINT:

44.88

NEAR:

6.48

Martin Ratio

MINT:

490.99

NEAR:

17.55

Ulcer Index

MINT:

0.01%

NEAR:

0.28%

Daily Std Dev

MINT:

0.43%

NEAR:

1.70%

Max Drawdown

MINT:

-4.62%

NEAR:

-9.60%

Current Drawdown

MINT:

0.00%

NEAR:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MINT achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly higher than NEAR's 0.16% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MINT having a 2.23% annualized return and NEAR not far ahead at 2.33%.


MINT

YTD

0.19%

1M

0.39%

6M

2.69%

1Y

5.79%

5Y*

2.52%

10Y*

2.23%

NEAR

YTD

0.16%

1M

0.29%

6M

2.69%

1Y

5.11%

5Y*

2.90%

10Y*

2.33%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MINT vs. NEAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

MINT has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than NEAR's 0.25% expense ratio.


MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund
Expense ratio chart for MINT: current value at 0.36% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.36%
Expense ratio chart for NEAR: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

MINT vs. NEAR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MINT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of MINT is 100100
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of MINT is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of MINT is 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of MINT is 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of MINT is 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of MINT is 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

NEAR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NEAR is 9696
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NEAR is 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NEAR is 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NEAR is 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NEAR is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NEAR is 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

MINT vs. NEAR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund (MINT) and iShares Short Maturity Bond ETF (NEAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for MINT, currently valued at 13.40, compared to the broader market0.002.004.0013.402.92
The chart of Sortino ratio for MINT, currently valued at 31.42, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0031.424.27
The chart of Omega ratio for MINT, currently valued at 9.26, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.009.261.59
The chart of Calmar ratio for MINT, currently valued at 44.88, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0044.886.48
The chart of Martin ratio for MINT, currently valued at 490.99, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00490.9917.55
MINT
NEAR

The current MINT Sharpe Ratio is 13.40, which is higher than the NEAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MINT and NEAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio5.0010.0015.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
13.40
2.92
MINT
NEAR

Dividends

MINT vs. NEAR - Dividend Comparison

MINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.21%, more than NEAR's 5.00% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund
5.21%5.22%4.91%1.90%0.44%1.15%2.65%2.32%1.61%1.35%0.88%0.80%
NEAR
iShares Short Maturity Bond ETF
5.00%5.00%4.58%1.78%0.76%1.53%2.69%2.25%1.52%1.07%0.85%0.85%

Drawdowns

MINT vs. NEAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MINT drawdown since its inception was -4.62%, smaller than the maximum NEAR drawdown of -9.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MINT and NEAR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-0.80%-0.60%-0.40%-0.20%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember202500
MINT
NEAR

Volatility

MINT vs. NEAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Strategy Fund (MINT) is 0.09%, while iShares Short Maturity Bond ETF (NEAR) has a volatility of 0.56%. This indicates that MINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NEAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.10%0.20%0.30%0.40%0.50%0.60%0.70%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.09%
0.56%
MINT
NEAR
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab