MFDX vs. META

Last updated Jun 17, 2026

MFDX (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF) is Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index, while META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, MFDX returned 10.61%/yr vs 12.47%/yr for META. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

MFDX vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFDX achieves a 11.33% return, which is significantly higher than META's -8.91% return.

MFDX

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 2.63%
• YTD: 11.33%
• 6M: 12.81%
• 1Y: 24.10%
• 3Y*: 18.08%
• 5Y*: 10.61%
• 10Y*: —

META

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: -2.19%
• YTD: -8.91%
• 6M: -8.50%
• 1Y: -14.23%
• 3Y*: 29.16%
• 5Y*: 12.47%
• 10Y*: 18.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFDX vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF	11.33%	34.27%	4.40%	17.54%	-10.27%	11.07%	6.90%	19.88%	-14.88%	7.07%
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	-8.91%	13.09%	66.05%	194.13%	-64.22%	23.13%	33.09%	56.57%	-25.71%	3.36%

Correlation

The correlation between MFDX and META is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.37
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2017	0.45

Return for Risk

MFDX vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MFDX

MFDX Risk / Return Rank: 51
MFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
MFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
MFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
MFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
MFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 54

META

META Risk / Return Rank: 24
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
META Omega Ratio Rank: 22
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
META Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MFDX vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MFDX	META	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	-0.40	+2.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	-0.36	+2.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	0.95	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.27	-0.43	+2.70
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.92	-0.88	+9.80

MFDX vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFDX and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MFDX vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFDX drawdown since its inception was -36.05%, smaller than the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFDX and META.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFDX	META	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.05%	-76.74%	+40.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.66%	-33.30%	+22.64%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.62%	-34.15%	+22.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.58%	-76.74%	+51.16%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-76.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	-23.78%	+23.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.48%	-15.83%	+9.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.71%	16.20%	-13.49%

Volatility

MFDX vs. META - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) is 4.76%, while Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a volatility of 11.41%. This indicates that MFDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MFDX	META	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.76%	11.41%	-6.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.93%	27.32%	-15.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.17%	35.83%	-21.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.12%	44.10%	-28.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.43%	38.72%	-22.29%

Dividends

MFDX vs. META - Dividend Comparison

MFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than META's 0.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
META Meta Platforms, Inc.	0.35%	0.32%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF	2.75%	2.97%	3.16%	3.12%	2.85%	2.99%	1.58%	2.88%	2.13%	0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MFDX and META in my portfolio?

MFDX and META have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MFDX or META?

META has higher volatility (11.41%) compared to MFDX (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFDX dropped -36.05% vs META's -76.74%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MFDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.