PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFDX vs. IDEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFDX vs. IDEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFDX achieves a 10.18% return, which is significantly lower than IDEV's 11.37% return.


MFDX

1D
-0.43%
1M
0.37%
6M
4.44%
YTD
10.18%
1Y
22.36%
3Y*
17.13%
5Y*
10.45%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.77%

IDEV

1D
-0.72%
1M
1.04%
6M
6.43%
YTD
11.37%
1Y
25.30%
3Y*
16.97%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$135.88M$124.12M$125.37M
$1.14M$830.75K$740.34K

MFDX vs. IDEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFDX
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF
10.18%34.27%4.40%17.54%-10.27%11.07%6.90%19.88%-14.88%7.07%
IDEV
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF
11.37%32.56%4.54%17.36%-14.99%13.00%8.32%23.12%-14.10%6.55%

Correlation

The correlation between MFDX and IDEV is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2017

0.97

The correlation between MFDX and IDEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

MFDX vs. IDEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MFDX
IDEV

Industrials

19.0%
18.4%

Financial Services

15.3%
24.8%

Technology

10.6%
11.9%

Basic Materials

10.2%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

8.6%
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
7.6%

Healthcare

6.9%
8.7%

Energy

6.4%
5.0%

Communication Services

6.3%
3.9%

Utilities

6.3%
3.5%

Real Estate

2.3%
2.6%

Industrials

MFDX
19.0%
IDEV
18.4%

Financial Services

MFDX
15.3%
IDEV
24.8%

Technology

MFDX
10.6%
IDEV
11.9%

Basic Materials

MFDX
10.2%
IDEV
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

MFDX
8.6%
IDEV
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

MFDX
8.0%
IDEV
7.6%

Healthcare

MFDX
6.9%
IDEV
8.7%

Energy

MFDX
6.4%
IDEV
5.0%

Communication Services

MFDX
6.3%
IDEV
3.9%

Utilities

MFDX
6.3%
IDEV
3.5%

Real Estate

MFDX
2.3%
IDEV
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFDX vs. IDEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MFDX
MFDX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
MFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

IDEV
IDEV Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
IDEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDEV Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
IDEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDEV Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MFDX vs. IDEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MFDXIDEVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.30

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

2.24

-0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.19

8.85

-0.66

MFDX vs. IDEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the IDEV Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFDX and IDEV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFDX vs. IDEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFDX drawdown since its inception was -36.05%, roughly equal to the maximum IDEV drawdown of -34.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFDX and IDEV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFDXIDEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.05%

-34.77%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.66%

-11.20%

+0.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.62%

-13.41%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.58%

-29.15%

+3.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.44%

-0.72%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.42%

-6.47%

+0.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

2.83%

-0.04%

Volatility

MFDX vs. IDEV - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) have volatilities of 4.45% and 4.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFDXIDEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

4.44%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.48%

13.19%

-0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.44%

15.21%

-0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.10%

16.36%

-1.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.40%

17.25%

-0.85%

MFDX vs. IDEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFDX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IDEV's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

MFDX vs. IDEV - Dividend Comparison

MFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than IDEV's 3.18% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDEV
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF
3.18%3.40%3.30%3.07%2.69%3.05%2.00%3.18%3.16%1.54%
MFDX
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF
2.91%2.97%3.16%3.12%2.85%2.99%1.58%2.88%2.13%0.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, MFDX and IDEV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

MFDX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to IDEV (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFDX dropped -36.05% vs IDEV's -34.77%.

On 5-year performance, MFDX leads with 10.45% vs 9.25% for IDEV. On fees, IDEV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MFDX has performed better with a 10.45% return vs 9.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDEV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MFDX.

IDEV has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 2.91% for MFDX.

MFDX tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index, while IDEV tracks MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MFDX and 0.05% for IDEV.

IDEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFDX and IDEV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer