MFDX vs. CIL

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

MFDX (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF) and CIL (VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - MFDX tracks the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index while CIL tracks the Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MFDX returned 10.45%/yr vs 7.36%/yr for CIL. Their 0.76 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. MFDX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for CIL.

Performance

MFDX vs. CIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFDX achieves a 10.18% return, which is significantly higher than CIL's 5.44% return.

MFDX

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 0.37%
• 6M: 4.44%
• YTD: 10.18%
• 1Y: 22.36%
• 3Y*: 17.13%
• 5Y*: 10.45%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 8.77%

CIL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.44%
• 1Y: 16.21%
• 3Y*: 14.57%
• 5Y*: 7.36%
• 10Y*: 8.18%
• ALL TIME*: 7.33%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF	$1.14M	$830.75K	$740.34K

MFDX vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF	10.18%	34.27%	4.40%	17.54%	-10.27%	11.07%	6.90%	19.88%	-14.88%	7.07%
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	5.44%	32.99%	3.76%	16.29%	-16.00%	11.07%	7.21%	19.13%	-13.34%	6.73%

Correlation

The correlation between MFDX and CIL is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.57
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2017	0.76

The correlation between MFDX and CIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.84 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MFDX vs. CIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MFDX	CIL
Industrials	19.0%	18.4%
Financial Services	15.3%	24.8%
Technology	10.6%	6.4%
Basic Materials	10.2%	6.6%
Consumer Defensive	8.6%	8.8%
Consumer Cyclical	8.0%	8.2%
Healthcare	6.9%	7.7%
Energy	6.4%	4.6%
Communication Services	6.3%	5.8%
Utilities	6.3%	6.6%
Real Estate	2.3%	2.2%

Return for Risk

MFDX vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

MFDX

MFDX Risk / Return Rank: 67
MFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
MFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
MFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
MFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
MFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

CIL

CIL Risk / Return Rank: 93
CIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
CIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CIL Omega Ratio Rank: 96
CIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
CIL Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

MFDX vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MFDX	CIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	2.51	-0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	3.80	-1.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.67	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.15	3.69	-1.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.19	18.41	-10.22

MFDX vs. CIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MFDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the CIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MFDX and CIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MFDX vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFDX drawdown since its inception was -36.05%, roughly equal to the maximum CIL drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFDX and CIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MFDX	CIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.05%	-36.27%	+0.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.66%	-4.60%	-6.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.62%	-11.29%	-0.33%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.58%	-29.89%	+4.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.44%	-0.58%	-0.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.42%	-6.47%	+0.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.79%	1.03%	+1.76%

Volatility

MFDX vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) has a higher volatility of 4.45% compared to VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) at 0.00%. This indicates that MFDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MFDX	CIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.45%	0.00%	+4.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.48%	2.31%	+10.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.44%	6.80%	+7.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.10%	16.39%	-1.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.40%	16.74%	-0.34%

MFDX vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MFDX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

MFDX vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison

MFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, more than CIL's 1.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CIL VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF	1.05%	2.70%	3.46%	2.91%	2.41%	3.04%	1.73%	2.69%	2.85%	2.17%	2.34%	0.43%
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF	2.91%	2.97%	3.16%	3.12%	2.85%	2.99%	1.58%	2.88%	2.13%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MFDX and CIL in my portfolio?

MFDX and CIL have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MFDX or CIL?

MFDX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to CIL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFDX dropped -36.05% vs CIL's -36.27%.

Which ETF is better, MFDX or CIL?

On 5-year performance, MFDX leads with 10.45% vs 7.36% for CIL. On fees, MFDX is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, CIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MFDX or CIL?

Over the 5-year period, MFDX has performed better with a 10.45% return vs 7.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MFDX or CIL?

MFDX is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CIL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MFDX or CIL?

MFDX has the higher dividend yield at 2.91%, compared with 1.05% for CIL.

What is the main difference between MFDX and CIL?

MFDX tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index, while CIL tracks Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MFDX and 0.45% for CIL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.