MFDX vs. BKIE
MFDX (PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF) and BKIE (BNY Mellon International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - MFDX tracks the RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index while BKIE tracks the Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MFDX returned 9.92%/yr vs 9.05%/yr for BKIE. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. MFDX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for BKIE.
Performance
MFDX vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFDX achieves a 9.73% return, which is significantly higher than BKIE's 8.46% return.
MFDX
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- YTD
- 9.73%
- 6M
- 12.33%
- 1Y
- 23.13%
- 3Y*
- 18.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.92%
- 10Y*
- —
BKIE
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 3.12%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 6M
- 11.11%
- 1Y
- 22.58%
- 3Y*
- 17.39%
- 5Y*
- 9.05%
- 10Y*
- —
MFDX vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF | 9.73% | 34.27% | 4.40% | 17.54% | -10.27% | 11.07% | 35.35% |
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 8.46% | 32.08% | 4.63% | 18.25% | -13.60% | 13.75% | 34.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFDX and BKIE is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020 | 0.97 |
The correlation between MFDX and BKIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
MFDX vs. BKIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MFDX
BKIE
Industrials
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
Industrials
MFDX
BKIE
Financial Services
MFDX
BKIE
Basic Materials
MFDX
BKIE
Consumer Cyclical
MFDX
BKIE
Consumer Defensive
MFDX
BKIE
Technology
MFDX
BKIE
Communication Services
MFDX
BKIE
Energy
MFDX
BKIE
Utilities
MFDX
BKIE
Healthcare
MFDX
BKIE
Real Estate
MFDX
BKIE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFDX vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank
MFDX
BKIE
MFDX vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MFDX | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.28 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.18 | 1.99 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.66 | 7.68 | +0.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFDX | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 1.56 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 0.56 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.92 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
MFDX vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFDX drawdown since its inception was -36.05%, which is greater than BKIE's maximum drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFDX and BKIE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFDX | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.05% | -28.19% | -7.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.66% | -11.41% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.62% | -13.19% | +1.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.58% | -28.19% | +2.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.84% | -1.33% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.50% | -4.98% | -1.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | 2.95% | -0.27% |
Volatility
MFDX vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF (MFDX) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) have volatilities of 4.45% and 4.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFDX | BKIE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | 4.42% | +0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.34% | 12.17% | -0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.73% | 14.58% | -0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 16.12% | -1.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.41% | 16.34% | +0.07% |
MFDX vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFDX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFDX vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison
MFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.79%, less than BKIE's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKIE BNY Mellon International Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.12% | 3.31% | 2.88% | 2.97% | 2.58% | 1.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFDX PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor International Equity ETF | 2.79% | 2.97% | 3.16% | 3.12% | 2.85% | 2.99% | 1.58% | 2.88% | 2.13% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, MFDX and BKIE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
MFDX has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to BKIE (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MFDX dropped -36.05% vs BKIE's -28.19%.
On 5-year performance, MFDX leads with 9.92% vs 9.05% for BKIE. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, MFDX has performed better with a 9.92% return vs 9.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for MFDX.
BKIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 2.79% for MFDX.
MFDX tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor Developed Ex-U.S. Index, while BKIE tracks Morningstar Developed Markets ex-US Large Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for MFDX and 0.04% for BKIE.
MFDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MFDX and BKIE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer