METW vs. ARMH
METW (Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. METW is passively managed, while ARMH is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.40, they often move in opposite directions. METW charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.
Performance
METW vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
METW
- 1D
- 5.19%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- YTD
- -8.79%
- 6M
- -5.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMH
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
METW vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF | -2.16% |
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 23.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between METW and ARMH is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | -0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METW vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METW | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.40 | 471,500.14 | -471,500.54 |
Drawdowns
METW vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METW drawdown since its inception was -40.52%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -1.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METW and ARMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METW | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.52% | -1.61% | -38.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.63% | 0.00% | -27.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.31% | -0.40% | -16.91% |
Volatility
METW vs. ARMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METW | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.57% | 113.00% | -70.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.57% | 113.00% | -70.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.57% | 113.00% | -70.43% |
METW vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
METW has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
METW vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison
METW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 55.37%, while ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF | 55.37% | 30.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METW and ARMH have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for METW.
METW has the higher dividend yield at 55.37%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for METW and 0.19% for ARMH.
Find the right allocation for METW and ARMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer