METW vs. ARMH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

METW (Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. METW is passively managed, while ARMH is actively managed. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. METW charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.

Performance

METW vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

METW

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -9.52%
• YTD: -19.43%
• 6M: -20.16%
• 1Y: -26.35%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMH

• 1D: -9.46%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METW vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF	-13.67%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	19.49%

Correlation

The correlation between METW and ARMH is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026	0.08

Return for Risk

METW vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METW

METW Risk / Return Rank: 4
METW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
METW Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
METW Omega Ratio Rank: 4
METW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
METW Martin Ratio Rank: 3

ARMH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METW vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	METW	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.61	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.69	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.65	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.25	—	—

Drawdowns

METW vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METW drawdown since its inception was -40.52%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -24.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METW and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	METW	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.52%	-24.85%	-15.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.08%	-16.34%	-19.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.08%	-7.72%	-10.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.11%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	METW	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.67%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.51%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.19%	122.02%	-78.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.09%	122.02%	-78.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	43.09%	122.02%	-78.93%

METW vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

METW has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

METW vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

METW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 66.02%, while ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	0.00%	0.00%
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF	66.02%	30.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METW and ARMH in my portfolio?

METW and ARMH have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, METW or ARMH?

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, METW or ARMH?

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for METW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, METW or ARMH?

METW has the higher dividend yield at 66.02%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.

What is the main difference between METW and ARMH?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for METW and 0.19% for ARMH.