METW vs. AMZW

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

METW (Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF) and AMZW (Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - METW is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Ball Metaverse Index, while AMZW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. METW is passively managed, while AMZW is actively managed. Over the past year, METW returned -33.64% vs 25.64% for AMZW. Their 0.54 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. METW charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMZW.

Performance

METW vs. AMZW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) and Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METW achieves a -21.28% return, which is significantly lower than AMZW's 18.02% return.

METW

• 1D: 3.95%
• 1M: -6.21%
• 6M: -28.15%
• YTD: -21.28%
• 1Y: -33.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -25.91%

AMZW

• 1D: 18.15%
• 1M: 13.81%
• 6M: 13.42%
• YTD: 18.02%
• 1Y: 25.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 23.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF	$728.39K	$587.12K	$751.31K
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF	$410.48K	$431.36K	$525.98K

METW vs. AMZW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF	-21.28%	-9.14%
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF	18.02%	7.33%

Correlation

The correlation between METW and AMZW is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.54
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.54

The correlation between METW and AMZW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.

METW vs. AMZW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	METW	AMZW
Communication Services	20.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	20.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

METW vs. AMZW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

METW

METW Risk / Return Rank: 2
METW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
METW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
METW Omega Ratio Rank: 3
METW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
METW Martin Ratio Rank: 0

AMZW

AMZW Risk / Return Rank: 20
AMZW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
AMZW Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
AMZW Omega Ratio Rank: 22
AMZW Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
AMZW Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

METW vs. AMZW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) and Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	METW	AMZW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.79	0.32	-1.10
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.01	0.80	-1.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	1.10	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.89	0.51	-1.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.54	1.06	-2.60

METW vs. AMZW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METW Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is lower than the AMZW Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METW and AMZW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

METW vs. AMZW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METW drawdown since its inception was -40.52%, which is greater than AMZW's maximum drawdown of -26.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METW and AMZW.

Drawdown Indicators

	METW	AMZW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.52%	-26.79%	-13.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-40.52%	-26.79%	-13.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-37.54%	-2.81%	-34.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.25%	-9.73%	-9.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.36%	12.88%	+10.48%

Volatility

METW vs. AMZW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) is 18.32%, while Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) has a volatility of 19.61%. This indicates that METW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	METW	AMZW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.32%	19.61%	-1.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.37%	31.80%	+4.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.45%	42.59%	+4.86%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.63%	40.99%	+4.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	45.63%	40.99%	+4.64%

METW vs. AMZW - Expense Ratio Comparison

METW has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

METW vs. AMZW - Dividend Comparison

METW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 65.46%, more than AMZW's 40.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF	40.59%	25.29%
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF	65.46%	30.89%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METW and AMZW in my portfolio?

METW and AMZW have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, METW or AMZW?

AMZW has higher volatility (19.61%) compared to METW (18.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METW dropped -40.52% vs AMZW's -26.79%.

Which ETF is better, METW or AMZW?

On 1-year performance, AMZW leads with 25.64% vs -33.64% for METW. On fees, METW is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, METW has been the lower-risk option at 18.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, METW or AMZW?

Over the 1-year period, AMZW has performed better with a 25.64% return vs -33.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, METW or AMZW?

METW is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, METW or AMZW?

METW has the higher dividend yield at 65.46%, compared with 40.59% for AMZW.

What is the main difference between METW and AMZW?

METW is categorized as Technology Equities, while AMZW is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for METW and 0.99% for AMZW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMZW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.