METW vs. META
METW (Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the Ball Metaverse Index, while META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, METW returned -13.81% vs -7.68% for META. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep.
Performance
METW vs. META - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METW achieves a -1.13% return, which is significantly lower than META's 1.56% return.
METW
- 1D
- 7.05%
- 1M
- 20.64%
- 6M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- -1.13%
- 1Y
- -13.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
META
- 1D
- 5.97%
- 1M
- 17.31%
- 6M
- 2.66%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- -7.68%
- 3Y*
- 31.29%
- 5Y*
- 14.01%
- 10Y*
- 19.06%
METW vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF | -1.13% | -9.14% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 1.56% | -5.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between METW and META is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 1.00 |
The correlation between METW and META has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METW vs. META — Risk / Return Rank
METW
META
METW vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| METW | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.00 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.34 | -0.23 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | -0.44 | -0.18 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
METW vs. META - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METW drawdown since its inception was -40.52%, smaller than the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METW and META.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METW | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.52% | -76.74% | +36.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.52% | -33.30% | -7.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -76.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.55% | -15.01% | -6.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.72% | -15.88% | -2.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.25% | 17.46% | +4.79% |
Volatility
METW vs. META - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) has a higher volatility of 18.99% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 16.03%. This indicates that METW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METW | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.99% | 16.03% | +2.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.97% | 30.87% | +6.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.79% | 38.42% | +7.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.06% | 44.53% | +0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.06% | 38.96% | +6.10% |
Dividends
METW vs. META - Dividend Comparison
METW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 53.02%, more than META's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.31% | 0.32% | 0.34% |
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF | 53.02% | 30.89% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, METW and META move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
METW has higher volatility (18.99%) compared to META (16.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METW dropped -40.52% vs META's -76.74%.
META currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.20 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for METW and META
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer