METW vs. META
METW (Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the Ball Metaverse Index, while META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past year, METW returned -30.62% vs -22.21% for META. Their 1.00 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together.
Performance
METW vs. META - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METW achieves a -24.27% return, which is significantly lower than META's -18.19% return.
METW
- 1D
- -9.41%
- 1M
- -6.14%
- 6M
- -33.44%
- YTD
- -24.27%
- 1Y
- -30.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -28.50%
META
- 1D
- -7.95%
- 1M
- -4.31%
- 6M
- -26.86%
- YTD
- -18.19%
- 1Y
- -22.21%
- 3Y*
- 19.51%
- 5Y*
- 8.82%
- 10Y*
- 15.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 19.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.95B | $12.47B | $10.89B | |
| $373.93K | $425.63K | $520.64K |
METW vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF | -24.27% | -9.14% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | -18.19% | -5.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between METW and META is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025 | 1.00 |
The correlation between METW and META has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METW vs. META — Risk / Return Rank
METW
META
METW vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| METW | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 0.92 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | -0.67 | -0.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.32 | -1.23 | -0.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
METW vs. META - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METW drawdown since its inception was -40.52%, smaller than the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METW and META.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METW | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.52% | -76.74% | +36.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.52% | -33.30% | -7.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -76.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.91% | -31.54% | -8.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.19% | -15.89% | -3.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.24% | 18.15% | +5.09% |
Volatility
METW vs. META - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW) has a higher volatility of 20.64% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 17.43%. This indicates that METW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METW | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.64% | 17.43% | +3.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.03% | 31.76% | +6.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.28% | 39.64% | +7.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.55% | 44.68% | +0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.55% | 39.09% | +6.46% |
Dividends
METW vs. META - Dividend Comparison
METW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 68.04%, more than META's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.39% | 0.32% | 0.34% |
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF | 68.04% | 30.89% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, METW and META move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
METW has higher volatility (20.64%) compared to META (17.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METW dropped -40.52% vs META's -76.74%.
META currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.56 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for METW and META
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer