METV vs. PLTW

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

METV (Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF) and PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - METV is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Ball Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net, while PLTW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill. METV is passively managed, while PLTW is actively managed. Over the past year, METV returned 4.54% vs -7.90% for PLTW. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. METV charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for PLTW.

Performance

METV vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METV achieves a 1.19% return, which is significantly higher than PLTW's -15.00% return.

METV

• 1D: 2.00%
• 1M: 1.46%
• 6M: 9.40%
• YTD: 1.19%
• 1Y: 4.54%
• 3Y*: 22.55%
• 5Y*: 5.32%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.73%

PLTW

• 1D: 35.54%
• 1M: 30.08%
• 6M: -0.83%
• YTD: -15.00%
• 1Y: -7.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF	$763.15K	$886.46K	$952.24K
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	$3.52M	$3.12M	$3.79M

METV vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF	1.19%	21.69%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	-15.00%	28.26%

Correlation

The correlation between METV and PLTW is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	0.52

The correlation between METV and PLTW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

METV vs. PLTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	METV	PLTW
Technology	54.1%	20.0%
Communication Services	17.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	-
Financial Services	3.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

METV vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

METV

METV Risk / Return Rank: 13
METV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
METV Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
METV Omega Ratio Rank: 14
METV Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
METV Martin Ratio Rank: 13

PLTW

PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 10
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 13
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

METV vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	METV	PLTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.18	-0.11	+0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.42	0.36	+0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.04	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.16	-0.14	+0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.34	-0.25	+0.59

METV vs. PLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METV Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is higher than the PLTW Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METV and PLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

METV vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METV drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, roughly equal to the maximum PLTW drawdown of -57.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METV and PLTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	METV	PLTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.64%	-57.27%	-2.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.27%	-57.27%	+29.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.27%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.50%	-30.48%	+19.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.55%	-25.27%	-0.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.37%	31.69%	-18.32%

Volatility

METV vs. PLTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) is 6.49%, while PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a volatility of 34.29%. This indicates that METV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	METV	PLTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.49%	34.29%	-27.80%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.50%	57.64%	-38.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.39%	71.95%	-46.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.11%	79.04%	-48.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.89%	79.04%	-49.15%

METV vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

METV has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than PLTW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

METV vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison

METV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than PLTW's 98.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF	0.18%	0.18%	0.00%	0.17%	0.09%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	98.38%	72.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both METV and PLTW in my portfolio?

METV and PLTW have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, METV or PLTW?

PLTW has higher volatility (34.29%) compared to METV (6.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METV dropped -59.64% vs PLTW's -57.27%.

Which ETF is better, METV or PLTW?

On 1-year performance, METV leads with 4.54% vs -7.90% for PLTW. On fees, METV is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, METV has been the lower-risk option at 6.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, METV or PLTW?

Over the 1-year period, METV has performed better with a 4.54% return vs -7.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, METV or PLTW?

METV is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for PLTW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, METV or PLTW?

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 98.38%, compared with 0.18% for METV.

What is the main difference between METV and PLTW?

METV is categorized as Technology Equities, while PLTW is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for METV and 0.99% for PLTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

METV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.