PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PLTW vs. CHPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PLTW vs. CHPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PLTW achieves a -42.11% return, which is significantly lower than CHPY's 82.68% return.


PLTW

1D
-3.23%
1M
-18.15%
YTD
-42.11%
6M
-48.01%
1Y
-26.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CHPY

1D
-6.97%
1M
10.89%
YTD
82.68%
6M
81.99%
1Y
134.57%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PLTW vs. CHPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PLTW
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF
-42.11%116.77%
CHPY
YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF
82.68%56.76%

Correlation

The correlation between PLTW and CHPY is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PLTW vs. CHPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTW
PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

CHPY
CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PLTW vs. CHPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PLTWCHPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.64

-0.67

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.51

11.13

-11.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.98

39.19

-40.17

PLTW vs. CHPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PLTW Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the CHPY Sharpe Ratio of 4.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PLTW and CHPY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PLTW vs. CHPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PLTW drawdown since its inception was -52.65%, which is greater than CHPY's maximum drawdown of -12.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PLTW and CHPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PLTWCHPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.65%

-12.19%

-40.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.65%

-12.17%

-40.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.65%

-6.97%

-45.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.35%

-2.14%

-21.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.25%

3.45%

+23.80%

Volatility

PLTW vs. CHPY - Volatility Comparison

PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW) has a higher volatility of 23.13% compared to YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY) at 19.72%. This indicates that PLTW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PLTWCHPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.13%

19.72%

+3.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.72%

27.95%

+18.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.56%

32.57%

+28.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.29%

36.37%

+37.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.29%

36.37%

+37.92%

PLTW vs. CHPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PLTW and CHPY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

PLTW vs. CHPY - Dividend Comparison

PLTW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 151.83%, more than CHPY's 29.64% yield.


PositionTTM2025
CHPY
YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF
29.64%28.19%
PLTW
PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF
151.83%72.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


PLTW and CHPY have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTW has higher volatility (23.13%) compared to CHPY (19.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PLTW dropped -52.65% vs CHPY's -12.19%.

On 1-year performance, CHPY leads with 134.57% vs -26.59% for PLTW. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, CHPY has been the lower-risk option at 19.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CHPY has performed better with a 134.57% return vs -26.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PLTW and CHPY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 151.83%, compared with 29.64% for CHPY.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax.

CHPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.16 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PLTW and CHPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer