METV vs. META
METV (Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the Ball Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net, while META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, METV returned 23.94%/yr vs 32.06%/yr for META. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
METV vs. META - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, METV achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly higher than META's -5.54% return.
METV
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 5.65%
- YTD
- 1.54%
- 6M
- -2.08%
- 1Y
- 20.08%
- 3Y*
- 23.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
META
- 1D
- 4.24%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- -5.54%
- 6M
- -2.44%
- 1Y
- -6.29%
- 3Y*
- 32.06%
- 5Y*
- 13.70%
- 10Y*
- 18.15%
METV vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF | 1.54% | 30.83% | 24.93% | 60.57% | -52.66% | 0.40% |
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | -5.54% | 13.09% | 66.05% | 194.13% | -64.22% | -3.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between METV and META is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021 | 0.67 |
The correlation between METV and META shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
METV vs. META — Risk / Return Rank
METV
META
METV vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| METV | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.00 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | -0.19 | +0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.64 | -0.41 | +2.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| METV | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | -0.18 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.56 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
METV vs. META - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum METV drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, smaller than the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METV and META.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| METV | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.64% | -76.74% | +17.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.27% | -33.30% | +5.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.27% | -34.15% | +5.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -76.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -76.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.18% | -20.96% | +10.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.00% | -15.25% | -10.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.29% | 15.47% | -3.18% |
Volatility
METV vs. META - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) is 5.70%, while Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) has a volatility of 8.84%. This indicates that METV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| METV | META | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.70% | 8.84% | -3.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.67% | 26.58% | -8.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.88% | 35.23% | -11.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.96% | 43.99% | -14.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.96% | 38.64% | -8.68% |
Dividends
METV vs. META - Dividend Comparison
METV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than META's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
META Meta Platforms, Inc. | 0.34% | 0.32% | 0.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF | 0.18% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
METV and META have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
META has higher volatility (8.84%) compared to METV (5.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, METV dropped -59.64% vs META's -76.74%.
METV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for METV and META
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer