METV vs. MAGS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS).

METV and MAGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. METV is a passively managed fund by Roundhill Investments that tracks the performance of the Ball Metaverse Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Jun 30, 2021. MAGS is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Apr 10, 2023.

Performance

METV vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

METV vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF	-15.18%	30.83%	24.93%	24.91%
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	-12.16%	22.99%	63.97%	37.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, METV achieves a -15.18% return, which is significantly lower than MAGS's -12.16% return.

METV

• 1D: 4.46%
• 1M: -4.21%
• YTD: -15.18%
• 6M: -22.53%
• 1Y: 18.30%
• 3Y*: 19.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MAGS

• 1D: 4.60%
• 1M: -5.56%
• YTD: -12.16%
• 6M: -9.36%
• 1Y: 28.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

METV vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

METV has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.

METV

Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF

MAGS

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF

Return for Risk

METV vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

METV

METV Risk / Return Rank: 33
METV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
METV Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
METV Omega Ratio Rank: 36
METV Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
METV Martin Ratio Rank: 24

MAGS

MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 62
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 62
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

METV vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	METV	MAGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	0.99	-0.35
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.08	1.61	-0.52
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.21	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.61	1.49	-0.88
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.63	5.25	-3.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

METV vs. MAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current METV Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the MAGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of METV and MAGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	METV	MAGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64	0.99	-0.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	1.34	-1.30

Correlation

The correlation between METV and MAGS is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

METV vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison

METV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than MAGS's 1.68% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
METV Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF	0.21%	0.18%	0.00%	0.17%	0.09%
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	1.68%	1.48%	0.81%	0.44%	0.00%

Drawdowns

METV vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum METV drawdown since its inception was -59.64%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for METV and MAGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	METV	MAGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.64%	-29.91%	-29.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.27%	-18.62%	-9.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.97%	-14.87%	-10.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.41%	-4.75%	-21.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.62%	5.29%	+5.33%

Volatility

METV vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Ball Metaverse ETF (METV) has a higher volatility of 9.46% compared to Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) at 8.36%. This indicates that METV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	METV	MAGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.46%	8.36%	+1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.94%	15.45%	+3.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.94%	28.68%	+0.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.23%	26.29%	+3.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.23%	26.29%	+3.94%