MAGS vs. FNGS

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS).

MAGS and FNGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MAGS is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Apr 10, 2023. FNGS is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2019.

Performance

MAGS vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MAGS vs. FNGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	-12.16%	22.99%	63.97%	37.32%
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	-12.40%	18.64%	51.99%	45.38%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with MAGS having a -12.16% return and FNGS slightly lower at -12.40%.

MAGS

• 1D: 4.60%
• 1M: -5.56%
• YTD: -12.16%
• 6M: -9.36%
• 1Y: 28.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNGS

• 1D: 4.69%
• 1M: -4.21%
• YTD: -12.40%
• 6M: -14.82%
• 1Y: 19.65%
• 3Y*: 30.42%
• 5Y*: 15.68%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MAGS vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MAGS has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.

FNGS

MicroSectors FANG+ ETN

MAGS

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF

Return for Risk

MAGS vs. FNGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MAGS

MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 62
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 62
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 58

FNGS

FNGS Risk / Return Rank: 41
FNGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
FNGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
FNGS Omega Ratio Rank: 45
FNGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FNGS Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MAGS vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MAGS	FNGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	0.73	+0.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	1.26	+0.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.17	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.49	0.84	+0.65
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.25	2.59	+2.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MAGS vs. FNGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MAGS Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is higher than the FNGS Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MAGS and FNGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MAGS	FNGS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99	0.73	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.34	0.90	+0.44

Correlation

The correlation between MAGS and FNGS is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

MAGS vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison

MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, while FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	1.68%	1.48%	0.81%	0.44%
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

MAGS vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MAGS drawdown since its inception was -29.91%, smaller than the maximum FNGS drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGS and FNGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	MAGS	FNGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.91%	-48.98%	+19.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.62%	-22.93%	+4.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-48.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.87%	-19.32%	+4.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.75%	-11.02%	+6.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.29%	7.43%	-2.14%

Volatility

MAGS vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) have volatilities of 8.36% and 8.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MAGS	FNGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.36%	8.31%	+0.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.45%	15.68%	-0.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.68%	26.98%	+1.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.29%	29.97%	-3.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.29%	31.34%	-5.05%