MAGS vs. FNGS
Compare and contrast key facts about Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS).
MAGS and FNGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. MAGS is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Apr 10, 2023. FNGS is a passively managed fund by BMO Financial Group that tracks the performance of the NYSE FANG+ Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2019.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MAGS or FNGS.
Performance
MAGS vs. FNGS - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MAGS achieves a 54.53% return, which is significantly higher than FNGS's 42.24% return.
MAGS
54.53%
8.25%
26.07%
57.99%
N/A
N/A
FNGS
42.24%
4.27%
18.21%
49.69%
34.03%
N/A
Key characteristics
| MAGS | FNGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.30 | 1.97 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.94 | 2.54 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.39 | 1.34 |
| Calmar Ratio | 3.16 | 2.74 |
| Martin Ratio | 10.27 | 8.89 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.57% | 5.48% |
| Daily Std Dev | 24.92% | 24.74% |
| Max Drawdown | -18.10% | -48.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.22% | -0.94% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
MAGS vs. FNGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MAGS has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGS's 0.58% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between MAGS and FNGS is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MAGS vs. FNGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) and MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MAGS vs. FNGS - Dividend Comparison
MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, while FNGS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 0.28% | 0.44% |
FNGS MicroSectors FANG+ ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
MAGS vs. FNGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MAGS drawdown since its inception was -18.10%, smaller than the maximum FNGS drawdown of -48.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MAGS and FNGS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MAGS vs. FNGS - Volatility Comparison
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) has a higher volatility of 8.40% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ ETN (FNGS) at 7.27%. This indicates that MAGS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.