MET vs. VDE
MET (MetLife, Inc.) is a stock, while VDE (Vanguard Energy ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Energy 25/50 Index. Over the past 10 years, MET returned 12.42%/yr vs 9.70%/yr for VDE. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
MET vs. VDE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MET achieves a 4.08% return, which is significantly lower than VDE's 32.24% return. Over the past 10 years, MET has outperformed VDE with an annualized return of 12.42%, while VDE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.70% annualized return.
MET
- 1D
- -2.25%
- 1M
- 3.33%
- YTD
- 4.08%
- 6M
- 6.00%
- 1Y
- 5.13%
- 3Y*
- 18.73%
- 5Y*
- 7.21%
- 10Y*
- 12.42%
VDE
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- -2.17%
- YTD
- 32.24%
- 6M
- 29.32%
- 1Y
- 45.53%
- 3Y*
- 17.97%
- 5Y*
- 20.43%
- 10Y*
- 9.70%
MET vs. VDE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET MetLife, Inc. | 4.08% | -0.80% | 27.68% | -5.49% | 19.23% | 37.43% | -3.42% | 28.84% | -15.77% | 21.67% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 32.24% | 7.11% | 6.75% | 0.03% | 62.89% | 56.31% | -33.02% | 9.28% | -19.95% | -2.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between MET and VDE is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2004 | 0.51 |
Over the past year, the correlation between MET and VDE has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MET vs. VDE — Risk / Return Rank
MET
VDE
MET vs. VDE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MetLife, Inc. (MET) and Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MET | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.36 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | 3.88 | -3.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.80 | 11.42 | -10.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MET | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 | 2.25 | -2.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.78 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.33 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.28 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
MET vs. VDE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MET drawdown since its inception was -82.37%, which is greater than VDE's maximum drawdown of -74.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MET and VDE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MET | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.37% | -74.20% | -8.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.46% | -11.80% | -5.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.97% | -21.41% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.09% | -26.58% | -8.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.16% | -69.29% | +14.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.20% | -6.43% | +2.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.64% | -19.96% | +2.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.42% | 4.00% | +2.42% |
Volatility
MET vs. VDE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MetLife, Inc. (MET) is 5.98%, while Vanguard Energy ETF (VDE) has a volatility of 7.99%. This indicates that MET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VDE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MET | VDE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.98% | 7.99% | -2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.26% | 16.33% | +0.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.89% | 20.38% | +2.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.69% | 26.40% | -0.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.69% | 29.93% | +0.76% |
Dividends
MET vs. VDE - Dividend Comparison
MET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than VDE's 2.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET MetLife, Inc. | 2.83% | 2.85% | 2.63% | 3.12% | 2.74% | 3.04% | 3.88% | 3.41% | 4.04% | 14.52% | 2.92% | 3.06% |
VDE Vanguard Energy ETF | 2.37% | 3.11% | 3.23% | 3.34% | 3.65% | 4.13% | 4.76% | 3.42% | 3.35% | 2.90% | 2.31% | 3.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MET and VDE have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VDE has higher volatility (7.99%) compared to MET (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MET dropped -82.37% vs VDE's -74.20%.
VDE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MET and VDE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer