MET vs. SLF
Compare and contrast key facts about MetLife, Inc. (MET) and Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF).
Performance
MET vs. SLF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MET vs. SLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET MetLife, Inc. | -9.77% | -0.80% | 27.68% | -5.49% | 19.23% | 37.43% | -3.42% | 28.84% | -15.77% | 21.67% |
SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | 1.31% | 9.72% | 19.48% | 17.77% | -12.89% | 29.71% | 1.55% | 42.69% | -16.37% | 11.18% |
Fundamentals
MET:
$7.54
SLF:
$7.29
MET:
9.38
SLF:
8.59
MET:
0.42
SLF:
0.77
MET:
$76.13B
SLF:
$41.86B
MET:
$12.20B
SLF:
$13.06B
MET:
$4.34B
SLF:
$5.32B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MET achieves a -9.77% return, which is significantly lower than SLF's 1.31% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MET having a 10.86% annualized return and SLF not far ahead at 11.38%.
MET
- 1D
- 3.59%
- 1M
- -1.87%
- YTD
- -9.77%
- 6M
- -12.90%
- 1Y
- -9.30%
- 3Y*
- 10.23%
- 5Y*
- 5.97%
- 10Y*
- 10.86%
SLF
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- -4.56%
- YTD
- 1.31%
- 6M
- 6.47%
- 1Y
- 13.97%
- 3Y*
- 15.43%
- 5Y*
- 8.82%
- 10Y*
- 11.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MET vs. SLF — Risk / Return Rank
MET
SLF
MET vs. SLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MetLife, Inc. (MET) and Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MET | SLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | 0.67 | -1.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | 0.98 | -1.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.15 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | 1.02 | -1.48 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.15 | 2.20 | -3.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MET | SLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 | 0.67 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 | 0.46 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.35 | 0.50 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.40 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between MET and SLF is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
MET vs. SLF - Dividend Comparison
MET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, less than SLF's 4.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MET MetLife, Inc. | 3.21% | 2.85% | 2.63% | 3.12% | 2.74% | 3.04% | 3.88% | 3.41% | 4.04% | 14.52% | 2.92% | 3.06% |
SLF Sun Life Financial Inc. | 4.15% | 4.03% | 4.00% | 4.98% | 4.59% | 3.32% | 3.69% | 3.47% | 4.71% | 3.17% | 3.98% | 4.64% |
Drawdowns
MET vs. SLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MET drawdown since its inception was -82.37%, roughly equal to the maximum SLF drawdown of -78.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MET and SLF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MET | SLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.37% | -78.60% | -3.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.46% | -14.91% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.09% | -30.77% | -4.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.16% | -50.84% | -4.32% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.95% | -8.32% | -8.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.71% | -16.99% | -0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.03% | 6.92% | +0.11% |
Volatility
MET vs. SLF - Volatility Comparison
MetLife, Inc. (MET) has a higher volatility of 6.49% compared to Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF) at 4.96%. This indicates that MET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MET | SLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.49% | 4.96% | +1.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.81% | 13.41% | +4.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.54% | 20.83% | +7.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.68% | 19.12% | +6.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.74% | 22.85% | +7.89% |
Financials
MET vs. SLF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between MetLife, Inc. and Sun Life Financial Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MET vs. SLF - Profitability Comparison
MET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 23.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SLF - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.92B and revenue of 8.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
MET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 23.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
SLF - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported an operating income of 1.13B and revenue of 8.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.6%.
MET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, MetLife, Inc. reported a net income of 809.00M and revenue of 23.81B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.
SLF - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported a net income of 792.35M and revenue of 8.92B, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.