PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLF vs. BRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SLF vs. BRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF) and Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLF achieves a 19.28% return, which is significantly higher than BRO's -27.63% return. Over the past 10 years, SLF has underperformed BRO with an annualized return of 12.27%, while BRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.23% annualized return.


SLF

1D
1.18%
1M
0.62%
YTD
19.28%
6M
28.93%
1Y
17.39%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
12.27%

BRO

1D
4.06%
1M
0.07%
YTD
-27.63%
6M
-27.57%
1Y
-47.93%
3Y*
-2.73%
5Y*
2.56%
10Y*
13.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLF vs. BRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLF
Sun Life Financial Inc.
19.28%9.72%19.48%17.77%-12.89%29.71%1.55%42.69%-16.37%11.18%
BRO
Brown & Brown, Inc.
-27.63%-21.37%44.32%25.73%-18.39%49.31%21.06%44.67%8.30%16.15%

Correlation

The correlation between SLF and BRO is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2000

0.37

The correlation between SLF and BRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.42 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

SLF:

$6.22

BRO:

$4.76

PE Ratio

SLF:

11.72

BRO:

12.05

PS Ratio

SLF:

0.98

BRO:

2.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

SLF:

$39.40B

BRO:

$6.43B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SLF:

$20.48B

BRO:

$3.82B

EBITDA (TTM)

SLF:

$4.74B

BRO:

$1.51B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLF vs. BRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLF
SLF Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLF Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLF Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

BRO
BRO Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
BRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BRO Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
BRO Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLF vs. BRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF) and Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLFBRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.68

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

-0.95

+2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.53

-1.64

+4.16

SLF vs. BRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLF Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the BRO Sharpe Ratio of -1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLF and BRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLFBRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

-1.70

+2.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.10

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.56

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.50

-0.08

Drawdowns

SLF vs. BRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLF drawdown since its inception was -78.60%, which is greater than BRO's maximum drawdown of -55.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLF and BRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLFBRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.60%

-55.85%

-22.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.91%

-50.55%

+35.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.91%

-55.85%

+40.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.77%

-55.85%

+25.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.84%

-55.85%

+5.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-53.41%

+53.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.88%

-13.51%

-3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.90%

29.40%

-22.50%

Volatility

SLF vs. BRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF) is 7.00%, while Brown & Brown, Inc. (BRO) has a volatility of 9.57%. This indicates that SLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLFBRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.00%

9.57%

-2.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.11%

21.69%

-7.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.10%

28.34%

-8.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.42%

24.78%

-5.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.89%

23.67%

-0.78%

Dividends

SLF vs. BRO - Dividend Comparison

SLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than BRO's 1.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BRO
Brown & Brown, Inc.
1.12%0.77%0.53%0.67%0.74%0.54%0.73%0.82%1.11%1.08%1.12%1.41%
SLF
Sun Life Financial Inc.
3.64%4.03%4.00%4.98%4.59%3.32%3.69%3.47%4.71%3.17%3.98%4.64%

Financials

SLF vs. BRO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sun Life Financial Inc. and Brown & Brown, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-5.00B0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
8.88B
1.90B
(SLF) Total Revenue
(BRO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

SLF vs. BRO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Sun Life Financial Inc. and Brown & Brown, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
100.0%
52.3%
Portfolio components
SLF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.88B and revenue of 8.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

BRO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brown & Brown, Inc. reported a gross profit of 994.00M and revenue of 1.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.3%.

SLF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported an operating income of 633.63M and revenue of 8.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.

BRO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brown & Brown, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

SLF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sun Life Financial Inc. reported a net income of 537.39M and revenue of 8.88B, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.

BRO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brown & Brown, Inc. reported a net income of 426.00M and revenue of 1.90B, resulting in a net margin of 22.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SLF and BRO have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BRO has higher volatility (9.57%) compared to SLF (7.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLF dropped -78.60% vs BRO's -55.85%.

SLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs -1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLF and BRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer