MEME vs. MAGS
MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MEME is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill, while MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MEME charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for MAGS.
Performance
MEME vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MEME achieves a 25.81% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's 1.56% return.
MEME
- 1D
- -6.02%
- 1M
- -20.25%
- 6M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- 25.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGS
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 3.20%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 1.56%
- 1Y
- 20.86%
- 3Y*
- 30.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MEME vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF | 25.81% | -38.00% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.56% | 3.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between MEME and MAGS is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.47 |
MEME vs. MAGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MEME
MAGS
Technology
Communication Services
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
MEME
MAGS
Communication Services
MEME
MAGS
Industrials
MEME
MAGS
-
Financial Services
MEME
MAGS
-
Healthcare
MEME
MAGS
-
Utilities
MEME
MAGS
-
Energy
MEME
MAGS
-
Basic Materials
MEME
MAGS
-
Consumer Cyclical
MEME
MAGS
Consumer Defensive
MEME
-
MAGS
-
Real Estate
MEME
-
MAGS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MEME vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank
MEME
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
MAGS
MEME vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MEME | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.13 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.48 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MEME vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MEME drawdown since its inception was -48.78%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEME and MAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MEME | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.78% | -29.91% | -18.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.90% | -5.57% | -28.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.48% | -4.81% | -23.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.01% | — |
Volatility
MEME vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MEME | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.85% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.54% | 21.23% | +54.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 75.54% | 26.01% | +49.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 75.54% | 26.01% | +49.53% |
MEME vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
MEME has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
MEME vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison
MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.46% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% |
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MEME and MAGS have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.
MAGS has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.
MEME is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MAGS is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for MEME and 0.29% for MAGS.
Find the right allocation for MEME and MAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer