PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEME vs. MAGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MEME vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEME achieves a 79.03% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's 3.73% return.


MEME

1D
-5.29%
1M
25.28%
YTD
79.03%
6M
68.18%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MAGS

1D
-1.08%
1M
2.17%
YTD
3.73%
6M
3.62%
1Y
31.34%
3Y*
33.71%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEME vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MEME
Roundhill Meme Stock ETF
79.03%-36.83%
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
3.73%2.67%

Correlation

The correlation between MEME and MAGS is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025

0.45

MEME vs. MAGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MEME
MAGS

Technology

58.8%
15.3%

Industrials

29.9%

-

Utilities

10.7%

-

Financial Services

5.7%

-

Communication Services

5.5%
9.3%

Healthcare

5.4%

-

Energy

4.8%

-

Basic Materials

4.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

MEME
58.8%
MAGS
15.3%

Industrials

MEME
29.9%
MAGS

-

Utilities

MEME
10.7%
MAGS

-

Financial Services

MEME
5.7%
MAGS

-

Communication Services

MEME
5.5%
MAGS
9.3%

Healthcare

MEME
5.4%
MAGS

-

Energy

MEME
4.8%
MAGS

-

Basic Materials

MEME
4.6%
MAGS

-

Consumer Cyclical

MEME

-

MAGS
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

MEME

-

MAGS

-

Real Estate

MEME

-

MAGS

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEME vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEME

MAGS
MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEME vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MEME vs. MAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEMEMAGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

1.55

-1.26

Drawdowns

MEME vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEME drawdown since its inception was -48.78%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEME and MAGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEMEMAGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.78%

-29.91%

-18.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.93%

-3.55%

-2.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.90%

-4.70%

-25.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.37%

Volatility

MEME vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEMEMAGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.19%

20.08%

+54.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.19%

25.94%

+48.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

74.19%

25.94%

+48.25%

MEME vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEME has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

MEME vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison

MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.


PositionTTM202520242023
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
1.43%1.48%0.81%0.44%
MEME
Roundhill Meme Stock ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


MEME and MAGS have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.

MAGS has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.

MEME is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MAGS is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for MEME and 0.29% for MAGS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEME and MAGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer