MEME vs. BIBL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MEME (Roundhill Meme Stock ETF) and BIBL (Inspire 100 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. MEME is actively managed, while BIBL is passively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MEME charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BIBL.

Performance

MEME vs. BIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEME achieves a 79.03% return, which is significantly higher than BIBL's 23.84% return.

MEME

• 1D: -5.29%
• 1M: 25.28%
• YTD: 79.03%
• 6M: 68.18%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BIBL

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 5.68%
• YTD: 23.84%
• 6M: 22.77%
• 1Y: 40.34%
• 3Y*: 22.20%
• 5Y*: 10.11%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEME vs. BIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	79.03%	-36.83%
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	23.84%	0.21%

Correlation

The correlation between MEME and BIBL is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025	0.58

MEME vs. BIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MEME	BIBL
Technology	58.8%	30.1%
Industrials	29.9%	26.8%
Utilities	10.7%	3.5%
Financial Services	5.7%	8.3%
Communication Services	5.5%	-
Healthcare	5.4%	4.3%
Energy	4.8%	6.9%
Basic Materials	4.6%	4.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.5%
Real Estate	-	14.7%

Return for Risk

MEME vs. BIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIBL

BIBL Risk / Return Rank: 81
BIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
BIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
BIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 75
BIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
BIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEME vs. BIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Meme Stock ETF (MEME) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MEME	BIBL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.52	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.63	-0.34

Drawdowns

MEME vs. BIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEME drawdown since its inception was -48.78%, which is greater than BIBL's maximum drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEME and BIBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MEME	BIBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.78%	-36.12%	-12.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.94%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.60%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.93%	0.00%	-5.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.90%	-7.04%	-22.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.06%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	MEME	BIBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.62%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.63%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	74.19%	15.47%	+58.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	74.19%	19.59%	+54.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	74.19%	21.08%	+53.11%

MEME vs. BIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MEME has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than BIBL's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

MEME vs. BIBL - Dividend Comparison

MEME has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BIBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	0.95%	1.01%	0.92%	1.02%	0.98%	17.87%	1.67%	1.30%	1.49%	0.31%
MEME Roundhill Meme Stock ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MEME and BIBL in my portfolio?

MEME and BIBL have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, MEME or BIBL?

On fees, BIBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, MEME or BIBL?

BIBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for MEME.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MEME or BIBL?

BIBL has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.00% for MEME.

What is the main difference between MEME and BIBL?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Inspire. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for MEME and 0.35% for BIBL.