PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BIBL vs. FDLS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

BIBL vs. FDLS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) and Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

BIBL vs. FDLS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
4.92%17.27%12.49%17.87%-7.23%
FDLS
Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF
3.62%22.47%7.41%20.70%-1.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIBL achieves a 4.92% return, which is significantly higher than FDLS's 3.62% return.


BIBL

1D
3.22%
1M
-5.73%
YTD
4.92%
6M
6.80%
1Y
24.23%
3Y*
15.73%
5Y*
8.13%
10Y*

FDLS

1D
2.61%
1M
-5.60%
YTD
3.62%
6M
6.33%
1Y
32.55%
3Y*
17.02%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BIBL vs. FDLS - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIBL has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than FDLS's 0.76% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

BIBL vs. FDLS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIBL
BIBL Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
BIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
BIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

FDLS
FDLS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FDLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDLS Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FDLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDLS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BIBL vs. FDLS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) and Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BIBLFDLSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.20

1.51

-0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.72

2.10

-0.39

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.30

-0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

2.32

-0.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.47

10.20

-1.73

BIBL vs. FDLS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BIBL Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is comparable to the FDLS Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIBL and FDLS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BIBLFDLSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

1.51

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.75

-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between BIBL and FDLS is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

BIBL vs. FDLS - Dividend Comparison

BIBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than FDLS's 0.95% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
BIBL
Inspire 100 ETF
1.12%1.01%0.92%1.02%0.98%17.87%1.67%1.30%1.49%0.31%
FDLS
Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF
0.95%0.86%7.26%0.97%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

BIBL vs. FDLS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIBL drawdown since its inception was -36.12%, which is greater than FDLS's maximum drawdown of -23.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIBL and FDLS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


BIBLFDLSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.12%

-23.32%

-12.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.93%

-14.05%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.01%

-6.22%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.17%

-4.00%

-3.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

3.20%

-0.27%

Volatility

BIBL vs. FDLS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) is 6.90%, while Inspire Fidelis Multi Factor ETF (FDLS) has a volatility of 7.42%. This indicates that BIBL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDLS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


BIBLFDLSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.90%

7.42%

-0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.24%

13.67%

-1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.37%

21.60%

-1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.44%

19.24%

+0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.15%

19.24%

+1.91%