BCHP vs. ALTL

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BCHP (Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF) and ALTL (Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. BCHP is actively managed, while ALTL is passively managed. Over the past year, BCHP returned 2.55% vs 46.05% for ALTL. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCHP charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for ALTL.

Performance

BCHP vs. ALTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BCHP achieves a -4.08% return, which is significantly lower than ALTL's 20.56% return.

BCHP

• 1D: -2.07%
• 1M: -3.85%
• YTD: -4.08%
• 6M: -4.11%
• 1Y: 2.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ALTL

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: 10.54%
• YTD: 20.56%
• 6M: 20.25%
• 1Y: 46.05%
• 3Y*: 14.20%
• 5Y*: 6.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCHP vs. ALTL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
BCHP Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF	-4.08%	10.20%	20.55%	13.14%
ALTL Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF	20.56%	16.61%	12.30%	-12.46%

Correlation

The correlation between BCHP and ALTL is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.45
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023	0.51

The correlation between BCHP and ALTL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

BCHP vs. ALTL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	BCHP	ALTL
Technology	33.7%	42.5%
Financial Services	24.9%	16.7%
Consumer Cyclical	15.1%	12.4%
Communication Services	13.0%	3.7%
Industrials	9.7%	9.7%
Healthcare	3.6%	1.9%
Real Estate	1.2%	14.8%
Basic Materials	-	6.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	1.0%
Energy	-	1.8%
Utilities	-	4.0%

Return for Risk

BCHP vs. ALTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCHP

BCHP Risk / Return Rank: 10
BCHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
BCHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
BCHP Omega Ratio Rank: 10
BCHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
BCHP Martin Ratio Rank: 10

ALTL

ALTL Risk / Return Rank: 77
ALTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
ALTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
ALTL Omega Ratio Rank: 73
ALTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
ALTL Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCHP vs. ALTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCHP	ALTL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.15	2.30	-2.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.32	2.98	-2.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.42	-0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.14	4.73	-4.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.45	15.98	-15.53

BCHP vs. ALTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BCHP Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the ALTL Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BCHP and ALTL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BCHP vs. ALTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCHP drawdown since its inception was -18.56%, smaller than the maximum ALTL drawdown of -31.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCHP and ALTL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCHP	ALTL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.56%	-31.91%	+13.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.12%	-9.79%	-8.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.21%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.82%	0.00%	-6.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.00%	-11.50%	+8.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.74%	2.89%	+2.85%

Volatility

BCHP vs. ALTL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP) is 6.09%, while Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) has a volatility of 10.73%. This indicates that BCHP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BCHP	ALTL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.09%	10.73%	-4.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.76%	14.62%	-0.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.59%	20.16%	-3.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.00%	18.89%	-1.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.00%	20.41%	-3.41%

BCHP vs. ALTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

BCHP has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than ALTL's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

BCHP vs. ALTL - Dividend Comparison

BCHP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.85%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ALTL Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF	0.85%	0.95%	1.56%	1.28%	1.23%	1.06%	0.75%
BCHP Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF	0.00%	0.00%	1.02%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCHP and ALTL in my portfolio?

BCHP and ALTL have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BCHP or ALTL?

ALTL has higher volatility (10.73%) compared to BCHP (6.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BCHP dropped -18.56% vs ALTL's -31.91%.

Which ETF is better, BCHP or ALTL?

On 1-year performance, ALTL leads with 46.05% vs 2.55% for BCHP. On fees, BCHP is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, BCHP has been the lower-risk option at 6.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BCHP or ALTL?

Over the 1-year period, ALTL has performed better with a 46.05% return vs 2.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCHP or ALTL?

BCHP is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ALTL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCHP or ALTL?

ALTL has the higher dividend yield at 0.85%, compared with 0.00% for BCHP.

What is the main difference between BCHP and ALTL?

They also come from different issuers: Principal and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for BCHP and 0.60% for ALTL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ALTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.