BCHP vs. IG
BCHP (Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF) and IG (Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCHP is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Principal, while IG is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by Principal. Both are actively managed. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BCHP charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for IG.
Performance
BCHP vs. IG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BCHP
- 1D
- 3.25%
- 1M
- 2.74%
- 6M
- 2.77%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 1.67%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.65%
IG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.80M | $1.22M | $1.16M | |
| $1.13M | $833.84K | $963.03K |
BCHP vs. IG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BCHP Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF | 2.55% |
IG Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF | -1.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCHP and IG is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2026 | 0.55 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCHP vs. IG — Risk / Return Rank
BCHP
IG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BCHP vs. IG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF (BCHP) and Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF (IG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BCHP | IG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.18 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BCHP vs. IG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCHP drawdown since its inception was -18.56%, which is greater than IG's maximum drawdown of -2.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCHP and IG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCHP | IG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.56% | -2.37% | -16.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.92% | -2.37% | +0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.09% | -0.75% | -2.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.04% | — | — |
Volatility
BCHP vs. IG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCHP | IG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.81% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.32% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.39% | 4.54% | +12.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.07% | 4.54% | +12.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.07% | 4.54% | +12.53% |
BCHP vs. IG - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCHP has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than IG's 0.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCHP vs. IG - Dividend Comparison
BCHP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BCHP Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.02% | 0.19% |
IG Principal Investment Grade Corporate Active ETF | 1.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCHP and IG have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IG is cheaper at 0.26% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IG is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for BCHP.
IG has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.00% for BCHP.
BCHP is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IG is Corporate Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for BCHP and 0.26% for IG.
Find the right allocation for BCHP and IG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer