PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEDP vs. BKNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MEDP vs. BKNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) and Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEDP achieves a -16.79% return, which is significantly higher than BKNG's -22.63% return.


MEDP

1D
-1.63%
1M
10.28%
YTD
-16.79%
6M
-16.23%
1Y
53.73%
3Y*
28.75%
5Y*
21.69%
10Y*

BKNG

1D
0.83%
1M
6.66%
YTD
-22.63%
6M
-21.85%
1Y
-23.87%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
12.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEDP vs. BKNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MEDP
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
-16.79%69.05%8.38%44.31%-2.40%56.35%65.60%58.81%45.97%0.53%
BKNG
Booking Holdings Inc.
-22.63%8.59%41.31%76.02%-16.00%7.72%8.45%19.24%-0.88%18.53%

Correlation

The correlation between MEDP and BKNG is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2016

0.32

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MEDP:

$13.54B

BKNG:

$130.96B

EPS

MEDP:

$15.63

BKNG:

$7.60

PE Ratio

MEDP:

29.89

BKNG:

21.71

PEG Ratio

MEDP:

0.90

BKNG:

0.32

PS Ratio

MEDP:

5.14

BKNG:

4.82

Total Revenue (TTM)

MEDP:

$2.68B

BKNG:

$27.69B

Gross Profit (TTM)

MEDP:

$778.59M

BKNG:

$22.16B

EBITDA (TTM)

MEDP:

$572.96M

BKNG:

$9.27B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEDP vs. BKNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEDP
MEDP Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
MEDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEDP Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
MEDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEDP Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

BKNG
BKNG Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
BKNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKNG Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
BKNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKNG Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEDP vs. BKNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) and Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MEDPBKNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

0.89

+0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

-0.72

+2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.28

-1.36

+4.64

MEDP vs. BKNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEDP Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is higher than the BKNG Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEDP and BKNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MEDP vs. BKNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEDP drawdown since its inception was -42.87%, smaller than the maximum BKNG drawdown of -99.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEDP and BKNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEDPBKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.87%

-99.32%

+56.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.61%

-33.35%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.38%

-33.35%

-6.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.87%

-39.53%

-3.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.69%

-28.50%

+3.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.92%

-47.05%

+34.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.45%

17.53%

-1.08%

Volatility

MEDP vs. BKNG - Volatility Comparison

Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) and Booking Holdings Inc. (BKNG) have volatilities of 6.83% and 6.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEDPBKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.83%

6.54%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.78%

26.83%

+10.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.99%

31.94%

+37.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.61%

32.26%

+19.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.76%

32.45%

+17.31%

Dividends

MEDP vs. BKNG - Dividend Comparison

MEDP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BKNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%.


PositionTTM20252024
BKNG
Booking Holdings Inc.
0.97%0.72%0.70%
MEDP
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

MEDP vs. BKNG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Medpace Holdings, Inc. and Booking Holdings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
706.60M
5.53B
(MEDP) Total Revenue
(BKNG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

MEDP vs. BKNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Medpace Holdings, Inc. and Booking Holdings Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
27.8%
0
Portfolio components
MEDP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Medpace Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 196.33M and revenue of 706.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.8%.

BKNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

MEDP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Medpace Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 141.50M and revenue of 706.60M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.0%.

BKNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported an operating income of 1.27B and revenue of 5.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.0%.

MEDP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Medpace Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 123.87M and revenue of 706.60M, resulting in a net margin of 17.5%.

BKNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Booking Holdings Inc. reported a net income of 1.08B and revenue of 5.53B, resulting in a net margin of 19.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


MEDP and BKNG have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MEDP has higher volatility (6.83%) compared to BKNG (6.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEDP dropped -42.87% vs BKNG's -99.32%.

MEDP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEDP and BKNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer