PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MEDP vs. ATEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

MEDP vs. ATEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) and Alphatec Holdings, Inc. (ATEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEDP achieves a -20.66% return, which is significantly higher than ATEC's -64.45% return.


MEDP

1D
-1.30%
1M
6.72%
YTD
-20.66%
6M
-23.66%
1Y
49.62%
3Y*
28.08%
5Y*
21.44%
10Y*

ATEC

1D
0.00%
1M
-28.28%
YTD
-64.45%
6M
-64.67%
1Y
-39.19%
3Y*
-21.32%
5Y*
-11.81%
10Y*
11.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MEDP vs. ATEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MEDP
Medpace Holdings, Inc.
-20.66%69.05%8.38%44.31%-2.40%56.35%65.60%58.81%45.97%0.53%
ATEC
Alphatec Holdings, Inc.
-64.45%129.19%-39.25%22.35%8.05%-21.28%104.65%209.83%-13.91%-17.13%

Correlation

The correlation between MEDP and ATEC is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2016

0.24

The correlation between MEDP and ATEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

MEDP:

$12.91B

ATEC:

$1.15B

EPS

MEDP:

$15.63

ATEC:

-$0.83

PS Ratio

MEDP:

4.90

ATEC:

1.90

PB Ratio

MEDP:

21.57

ATEC:

4.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

MEDP:

$2.68B

ATEC:

$594.98M

Gross Profit (TTM)

MEDP:

$778.59M

ATEC:

$533.27M

EBITDA (TTM)

MEDP:

$572.96M

ATEC:

-$22.26M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MEDP vs. ATEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEDP
MEDP Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
MEDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MEDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
MEDP Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MEDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
MEDP Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

ATEC
ATEC Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
ATEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATEC Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
ATEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATEC Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEDP vs. ATEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) and Alphatec Holdings, Inc. (ATEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MEDPATECDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.72

-0.56

+1.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.74

-0.49

+2.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

0.93

+0.37

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

-0.58

+1.97

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.23

-1.26

+4.49

MEDP vs. ATEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEDP Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is higher than the ATEC Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEDP and ATEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MEDPATECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

-0.56

+1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

-0.19

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

-0.17

+0.83

Drawdowns

MEDP vs. ATEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEDP drawdown since its inception was -42.87%, smaller than the maximum ATEC drawdown of -98.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEDP and ATEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MEDPATECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.87%

-98.90%

+56.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.61%

-69.18%

+32.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.38%

-73.51%

+34.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.87%

-73.51%

+30.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-28.20%

-93.06%

+64.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.89%

-80.44%

+67.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.83%

31.57%

-15.74%

Volatility

MEDP vs. ATEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) is 6.99%, while Alphatec Holdings, Inc. (ATEC) has a volatility of 42.80%. This indicates that MEDP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MEDPATECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.99%

42.80%

-35.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

38.11%

59.18%

-21.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.32%

69.82%

-0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

51.61%

63.07%

-11.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.83%

69.18%

-19.35%

Dividends

MEDP vs. ATEC - Dividend Comparison

Neither MEDP nor ATEC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

MEDP vs. ATEC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Medpace Holdings, Inc. and Alphatec Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
706.60M
0
(MEDP) Total Revenue
(ATEC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


MEDP and ATEC have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATEC has higher volatility (42.80%) compared to MEDP (6.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEDP dropped -42.87% vs ATEC's -98.90%.

MEDP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MEDP and ATEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer