MEDP vs. ATEC
MEDP (Medpace Holdings, Inc.) and ATEC (Alphatec Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Healthcare sector — MEDP in Diagnostics & Research, ATEC in Medical Devices. Over the past 5 years, MEDP returned 26.82%/yr vs -8.37%/yr for ATEC. Their 0.24 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
MEDP vs. ATEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MEDP achieves a 2.75% return, which is significantly higher than ATEC's -54.75% return.
MEDP
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 3.50%
- 6M
- -0.92%
- YTD
- 2.75%
- 1Y
- 36.40%
- 3Y*
- 31.18%
- 5Y*
- 26.82%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 35.39%
ATEC
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 6.73%
- 6M
- -35.81%
- YTD
- -54.75%
- 1Y
- -30.86%
- 3Y*
- -18.81%
- 5Y*
- -8.37%
- 10Y*
- 7.33%
- ALL TIME*
- -11.16%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $16.53M | $18.95M | $28.11M | |
| $292.94M | $222.04M | $171.72M |
MEDP vs. ATEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEDP Medpace Holdings, Inc. | 2.75% | 69.05% | 8.38% | 44.31% | -2.40% | 56.35% | 65.60% | 58.81% | 45.97% | 0.53% |
ATEC Alphatec Holdings, Inc. | -54.75% | 129.19% | -39.25% | 22.35% | 8.05% | -21.28% | 104.65% | 209.83% | -13.91% | -17.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between MEDP and ATEC is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2016 | 0.24 |
The correlation between MEDP and ATEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.35 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
MEDP:
$16.11B
ATEC:
$1.46B
MEDP:
$16.89
ATEC:
-$0.83
MEDP:
6.04
ATEC:
2.43
MEDP:
38.26
ATEC:
6.24
MEDP:
$2.78B
ATEC:
$594.98M
MEDP:
$800.22M
ATEC:
$533.27M
MEDP:
$613.10M
ATEC:
-$22.26M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MEDP vs. ATEC — Risk / Return Rank
MEDP
ATEC
MEDP vs. ATEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) and Alphatec Holdings, Inc. (ATEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MEDP | ATEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.05 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | -0.15 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.04 | -0.25 | +2.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MEDP vs. ATEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MEDP drawdown since its inception was -42.87%, smaller than the maximum ATEC drawdown of -98.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEDP and ATEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MEDP | ATEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.87% | -98.90% | +56.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.61% | -69.18% | +32.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.38% | -70.32% | +30.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.87% | -73.51% | +30.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -87.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.01% | -91.17% | +84.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.94% | -80.52% | +67.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.24% | 39.81% | -22.57% |
Volatility
MEDP vs. ATEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) is 16.14%, while Alphatec Holdings, Inc. (ATEC) has a volatility of 17.47%. This indicates that MEDP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MEDP | ATEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.14% | 17.47% | -1.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.25% | 56.13% | -14.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.64% | 71.72% | -27.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.09% | 63.25% | -11.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.81% | 68.68% | -18.87% |
Dividends
MEDP vs. ATEC - Dividend Comparison
Neither MEDP nor ATEC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
MEDP vs. ATEC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Medpace Holdings, Inc. and Alphatec Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MEDP and ATEC have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ATEC has higher volatility (17.47%) compared to MEDP (16.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MEDP dropped -42.87% vs ATEC's -98.90%.
MEDP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MEDP and ATEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer