MEDP vs. INMD

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) and InMode Ltd. (INMD).

Performance

MEDP vs. INMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) and InMode Ltd. (INMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

MEDP vs. INMD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
MEDP Medpace Holdings, Inc.	-12.85%	69.05%	8.38%	44.31%	-2.40%	56.35%	65.60%	5.98%
INMD InMode Ltd.	-6.74%	-12.04%	-24.91%	-37.70%	-49.42%	197.30%	21.12%	188.87%

Fundamentals

Market Cap MEDP : $14.18B INMD : $877.92M
EPS MEDP : $15.23 INMD : $1.47
PE Ratio MEDP : 32.13 INMD : 9.32
PS Ratio MEDP : 5.73 INMD : 2.36
PB Ratio MEDP : 30.88 INMD : 1.29
Total Revenue (TTM) MEDP : $2.53B INMD : $370.50M
Gross Profit (TTM) MEDP : $760.62M INMD : $290.97M
EBITDA (TTM) MEDP : $541.22M INMD : $104.17M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MEDP achieves a -12.85% return, which is significantly lower than INMD's -6.74% return.

MEDP

• 1D: 1.93%
• 1M: 7.00%
• YTD: -12.85%
• 6M: -10.01%
• 1Y: 64.40%
• 3Y*: 37.56%
• 5Y*: 23.60%
• 10Y*: —

INMD

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: -6.74%
• 6M: -10.34%
• 1Y: -24.31%
• 3Y*: -24.60%
• 5Y*: -18.43%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

MEDP vs. INMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MEDP

MEDP Risk / Return Rank: 78
MEDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
MEDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
MEDP Omega Ratio Rank: 84
MEDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
MEDP Martin Ratio Rank: 78

INMD

INMD Risk / Return Rank: 16
INMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
INMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
INMD Omega Ratio Rank: 16
INMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
INMD Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MEDP vs. INMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) and InMode Ltd. (INMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MEDP	INMD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	-0.61	+1.57
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.33	-0.67	+3.00
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	0.91	+0.41
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	-0.77	+2.61
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.41	-1.14	+6.55
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MEDP vs. INMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MEDP Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the INMD Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MEDP and INMD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MEDP	INMD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96	-0.61	+1.57
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47	-0.35	+0.82
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.70	0.18	+0.52

Correlation

The correlation between MEDP and INMD is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

MEDP vs. INMD - Dividend Comparison

Neither MEDP nor INMD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

MEDP vs. INMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MEDP drawdown since its inception was -42.87%, smaller than the maximum INMD drawdown of -86.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MEDP and INMD.

Drawdown Indicators

	MEDP	INMD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.87%	-86.96%	+44.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.96%	-29.03%	-3.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.87%	-86.96%	+44.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-21.13%	-86.00%	+64.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.64%	-55.20%	+42.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.21%	19.93%	-8.72%

Volatility

MEDP vs. INMD - Volatility Comparison

Medpace Holdings, Inc. (MEDP) has a higher volatility of 11.03% compared to InMode Ltd. (INMD) at 8.98%. This indicates that MEDP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than INMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MEDP	INMD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.03%	8.98%	+2.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.61%	26.22%	+3.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.76%	40.03%	+27.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.91%	52.80%	-1.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.57%	61.62%	-12.05%

Financials

MEDP vs. INMD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Medpace Holdings, Inc. and InMode Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

MEDP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Medpace Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 205.32M and revenue of 708.45M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.0%.

INMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, InMode Ltd. reported a gross profit of 81.30M and revenue of 103.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 78.3%.

MEDP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Medpace Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 153.27M and revenue of 708.45M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.6%.

INMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, InMode Ltd. reported an operating income of 25.99M and revenue of 103.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 25.0%.

MEDP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Medpace Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 135.13M and revenue of 708.45M, resulting in a net margin of 19.1%.

INMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, InMode Ltd. reported a net income of 27.03M and revenue of 103.85M, resulting in a net margin of 26.0%.