PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDY vs. UMDD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDY vs. UMDD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDY achieves a 14.02% return, which is significantly lower than UMDD's 37.62% return. Over the past 10 years, MDY has underperformed UMDD with an annualized return of 11.05%, while UMDD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.97% annualized return.


MDY

1D
0.90%
1M
3.28%
YTD
14.02%
6M
15.05%
1Y
26.67%
3Y*
15.81%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
11.05%

UMDD

1D
2.51%
1M
8.57%
YTD
37.62%
6M
40.07%
1Y
72.42%
3Y*
25.92%
5Y*
2.64%
10Y*
11.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDY vs. UMDD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF
14.02%7.19%13.64%16.07%-13.28%24.53%13.50%25.78%-11.29%15.93%
UMDD
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400
37.62%-2.57%19.68%27.21%-49.60%72.27%-17.30%78.90%-40.29%49.17%

Correlation

The correlation between MDY and UMDD is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

0.99

The correlation between MDY and UMDD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

MDY vs. UMDD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MDY
UMDD

Industrials

25.1%
13.6%

Technology

15.4%
9.1%

Financial Services

13.9%
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
5.2%

Healthcare

8.7%
4.8%

Real Estate

7.7%
4.1%

Energy

5.6%
2.9%

Basic Materials

4.8%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
2.2%

Utilities

3.1%
1.6%

Communication Services

1.0%
0.5%

Industrials

MDY
25.1%
UMDD
13.6%

Technology

MDY
15.4%
UMDD
9.1%

Financial Services

MDY
13.9%
UMDD
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

MDY
10.8%
UMDD
5.2%

Healthcare

MDY
8.7%
UMDD
4.8%

Real Estate

MDY
7.7%
UMDD
4.1%

Energy

MDY
5.6%
UMDD
2.9%

Basic Materials

MDY
4.8%
UMDD
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

MDY
3.8%
UMDD
2.2%

Utilities

MDY
3.1%
UMDD
1.6%

Communication Services

MDY
1.0%
UMDD
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDY vs. UMDD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDY
MDY Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
MDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDY Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
MDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDY Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

UMDD
UMDD Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
UMDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMDD Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
UMDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMDD Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDY vs. UMDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MDYUMDDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.73

1.56

+0.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.52

2.17

+0.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.26

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

2.70

+0.31

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.99

9.07

+1.92

MDY vs. UMDD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDY Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the UMDD Sharpe Ratio of 1.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDY and UMDD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MDYUMDDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

1.56

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.05

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.19

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.32

+0.20

Drawdowns

MDY vs. UMDD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDY drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, smaller than the maximum UMDD drawdown of -86.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDY and UMDD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDYUMDDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.33%

-86.24%

+30.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.82%

-26.04%

+17.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.03%

-60.33%

+36.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.03%

-64.61%

+40.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.22%

-86.24%

+44.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.75%

+5.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.03%

-23.62%

+16.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

7.76%

-5.34%

Volatility

MDY vs. UMDD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) is 4.40%, while ProShares UltraPro MidCap400 (UMDD) has a volatility of 13.72%. This indicates that MDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDYUMDDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.40%

13.72%

-9.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.30%

34.30%

-23.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.48%

46.81%

-31.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.77%

58.92%

-39.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.19%

62.29%

-41.10%

MDY vs. UMDD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDY has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than UMDD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

MDY vs. UMDD - Dividend Comparison

MDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than UMDD's 0.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF
1.04%1.15%1.18%1.21%1.37%0.96%1.12%1.34%1.39%1.18%1.31%1.35%
UMDD
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400
0.76%1.00%0.76%0.19%0.49%0.06%0.08%0.64%0.32%0.00%0.03%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, MDY and UMDD move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

UMDD has higher volatility (13.72%) compared to MDY (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDY dropped -55.33% vs UMDD's -86.24%.

On 10-year performance, UMDD leads with 11.97% vs 11.05% for MDY. On fees, MDY is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, MDY has been the lower-risk option at 4.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UMDD has performed better with a 11.97% return vs 11.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MDY is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UMDD.

MDY has the higher dividend yield at 1.04%, compared with 0.76% for UMDD.

MDY is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while UMDD is Leveraged Equities. MDY tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while UMDD tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: State Street and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for MDY and 0.95% for UMDD.

MDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDY and UMDD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer