MDY vs. IMCB
MDY (SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF) and IMCB (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - MDY tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index while IMCB tracks the IMCB-US - Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, MDY returned 11.89%/yr vs 12.15%/yr for IMCB. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. MDY charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IMCB.
Performance
MDY vs. IMCB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MDY having a 16.17% return and IMCB slightly higher at 16.74%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MDY having a 11.89% annualized return and IMCB not far ahead at 12.15%.
MDY
- 1D
- 0.92%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- 16.17%
- 6M
- 13.92%
- 1Y
- 26.46%
- 3Y*
- 16.06%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 11.89%
IMCB
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 3.67%
- YTD
- 16.74%
- 6M
- 15.03%
- 1Y
- 24.59%
- 3Y*
- 17.85%
- 5Y*
- 9.00%
- 10Y*
- 12.15%
MDY vs. IMCB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 16.17% | 7.19% | 13.64% | 16.07% | -13.28% | 24.53% | 13.50% | 25.78% | -11.29% | 15.93% |
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 16.74% | 10.25% | 15.10% | 16.37% | -16.09% | 22.81% | 13.35% | 31.49% | -11.53% | 19.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDY and IMCB is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2004 | 0.94 |
The correlation between MDY and IMCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
MDY vs. IMCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
MDY
IMCB
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
MDY
IMCB
Technology
MDY
IMCB
Financial Services
MDY
IMCB
Consumer Cyclical
MDY
IMCB
Healthcare
MDY
IMCB
Real Estate
MDY
IMCB
Energy
MDY
IMCB
Basic Materials
MDY
IMCB
Consumer Defensive
MDY
IMCB
Utilities
MDY
IMCB
Communication Services
MDY
IMCB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDY vs. IMCB — Risk / Return Rank
MDY
IMCB
MDY vs. IMCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MDY | IMCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.33 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 3.07 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.97 | 12.02 | -1.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MDY vs. IMCB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDY drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, smaller than the maximum IMCB drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDY and IMCB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDY | IMCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.33% | -58.80% | +3.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | -8.05% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.03% | -19.80% | -4.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.03% | -25.15% | +1.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.22% | -40.99% | -1.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -7.71% | +0.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 2.05% | +0.37% |
Volatility
MDY vs. IMCB - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) have volatilities of 4.51% and 4.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDY | IMCB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.51% | 4.67% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.69% | 10.25% | +1.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.79% | 13.27% | +2.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.78% | 17.64% | +2.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.17% | 19.65% | +1.52% |
MDY vs. IMCB - Expense Ratio Comparison
MDY has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCB's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
MDY vs. IMCB - Dividend Comparison
MDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than IMCB's 1.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 1.22% | 1.42% | 1.43% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.08% | 1.12% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.47% |
MDY SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF | 1.01% | 1.15% | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.37% | 0.96% | 1.12% | 1.34% | 1.39% | 1.18% | 1.31% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, MDY and IMCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IMCB has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to MDY (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDY dropped -55.33% vs IMCB's -58.80%.
On 10-year performance, IMCB leads with 12.15% vs 11.89% for MDY. On fees, IMCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, MDY has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IMCB has performed better with a 12.15% return vs 11.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IMCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for MDY.
IMCB has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 1.01% for MDY.
MDY tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while IMCB tracks IMCB-US - Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for MDY and 0.04% for IMCB.
IMCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDY and IMCB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer