PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MDY vs. IMCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MDY vs. IMCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with MDY having a 16.17% return and IMCB slightly higher at 16.74%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with MDY having a 11.89% annualized return and IMCB not far ahead at 12.15%.


MDY

1D
0.92%
1M
2.65%
YTD
16.17%
6M
13.92%
1Y
26.46%
3Y*
16.06%
5Y*
8.36%
10Y*
11.89%

IMCB

1D
0.51%
1M
3.67%
YTD
16.74%
6M
15.03%
1Y
24.59%
3Y*
17.85%
5Y*
9.00%
10Y*
12.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDY vs. IMCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF
16.17%7.19%13.64%16.07%-13.28%24.53%13.50%25.78%-11.29%15.93%
IMCB
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
16.74%10.25%15.10%16.37%-16.09%22.81%13.35%31.49%-11.53%19.70%

Correlation

The correlation between MDY and IMCB is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2004

0.94

The correlation between MDY and IMCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

MDY vs. IMCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
MDY
IMCB

Industrials

24.8%
18.5%

Technology

17.4%
22.6%

Financial Services

13.3%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
9.1%

Healthcare

9.1%
7.9%

Real Estate

7.4%
4.3%

Energy

5.0%
6.7%

Basic Materials

4.9%
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
5.1%

Utilities

3.0%
6.0%

Communication Services

1.0%
2.5%

Industrials

MDY
24.8%
IMCB
18.5%

Technology

MDY
17.4%
IMCB
22.6%

Financial Services

MDY
13.3%
IMCB
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

MDY
10.7%
IMCB
9.1%

Healthcare

MDY
9.1%
IMCB
7.9%

Real Estate

MDY
7.4%
IMCB
4.3%

Energy

MDY
5.0%
IMCB
6.7%

Basic Materials

MDY
4.9%
IMCB
5.3%

Consumer Defensive

MDY
3.4%
IMCB
5.1%

Utilities

MDY
3.0%
IMCB
6.0%

Communication Services

MDY
1.0%
IMCB
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MDY vs. IMCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDY
MDY Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
MDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDY Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
MDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDY Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

IMCB
IMCB Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IMCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IMCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IMCB Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IMCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
IMCB Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDY vs. IMCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MDYIMCBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.33

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

3.07

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.97

12.02

-1.05

MDY vs. IMCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDY Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the IMCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDY and IMCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MDY vs. IMCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDY drawdown since its inception was -55.33%, smaller than the maximum IMCB drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDY and IMCB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MDYIMCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.33%

-58.80%

+3.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.82%

-8.05%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.03%

-19.80%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.03%

-25.15%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.22%

-40.99%

-1.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.02%

-7.71%

+0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

2.05%

+0.37%

Volatility

MDY vs. IMCB - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF (MDY) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) have volatilities of 4.51% and 4.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MDYIMCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.51%

4.67%

-0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.69%

10.25%

+1.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.79%

13.27%

+2.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.78%

17.64%

+2.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.17%

19.65%

+1.52%

MDY vs. IMCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDY has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCB's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

MDY vs. IMCB - Dividend Comparison

MDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than IMCB's 1.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IMCB
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
1.22%1.42%1.43%1.55%1.70%1.08%1.12%1.32%1.80%1.31%1.79%1.47%
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF
1.01%1.15%1.18%1.21%1.37%0.96%1.12%1.34%1.39%1.18%1.31%1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, MDY and IMCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IMCB has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to MDY (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDY dropped -55.33% vs IMCB's -58.80%.

On 10-year performance, IMCB leads with 12.15% vs 11.89% for MDY. On fees, IMCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, MDY has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IMCB has performed better with a 12.15% return vs 11.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IMCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for MDY.

IMCB has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 1.01% for MDY.

MDY tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while IMCB tracks IMCB-US - Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for MDY and 0.04% for IMCB.

IMCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MDY and IMCB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer