IMCB vs. IMCG
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG).
IMCB and IMCG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IMCB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the IMCB-US - Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004. IMCG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004. Both IMCB and IMCG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IMCB or IMCG.
Key characteristics
| IMCB | IMCG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 2.93% | 2.96% |
| 1Y Return | 18.42% | 20.20% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.10% | 0.64% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 8.54% | 10.81% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 9.13% | 11.40% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.21 | 1.25 |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.49% | 14.66% |
| Max Drawdown | -58.80% | -58.96% |
| Current Drawdown | -5.44% | -11.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between IMCB and IMCG is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IMCB vs. IMCG - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IMCB having a 2.93% return and IMCG slightly higher at 2.96%. Over the past 10 years, IMCB has underperformed IMCG with an annualized return of 9.13%, while IMCG has yielded a comparatively higher 11.40% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IMCB vs. IMCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IMCB has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than IMCG's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IMCB vs. IMCG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IMCB vs. IMCG - Dividend Comparison
IMCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, more than IMCG's 0.84% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF | 1.51% | 1.55% | 1.70% | 1.08% | 1.12% | 1.32% | 1.80% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.47% | 1.40% | 1.19% |
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.84% | 0.85% | 0.91% | 0.41% | 0.09% | 0.29% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.38% | 0.60% | 0.36% |
Drawdowns
IMCB vs. IMCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IMCB drawdown since its inception was -58.80%, roughly equal to the maximum IMCG drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCB and IMCG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IMCB vs. IMCG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) is 3.79%, while iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) has a volatility of 4.39%. This indicates that IMCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.