PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
IMCB vs. VO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


IMCBVO
YTD Return20.31%21.60%
1Y Return37.08%37.45%
3Y Return (Ann)4.99%4.25%
5Y Return (Ann)11.00%12.05%
10Y Return (Ann)9.93%10.40%
Sharpe Ratio2.853.09
Sortino Ratio3.994.26
Omega Ratio1.501.55
Calmar Ratio2.302.11
Martin Ratio16.2119.12
Ulcer Index2.27%2.04%
Daily Std Dev12.87%12.64%
Max Drawdown-58.80%-58.89%
Current Drawdown-0.62%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.01.0

The correlation between IMCB and VO is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

IMCB vs. VO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, IMCB achieves a 20.31% return, which is significantly lower than VO's 21.60% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IMCB having a 9.93% annualized return and VO not far ahead at 10.40%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
12.48%
14.44%
IMCB
VO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IMCB vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IMCB and VO have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


IMCB
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
Expense ratio chart for IMCB: current value at 0.04% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.04%
Expense ratio chart for VO: current value at 0.04% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.04%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IMCB vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IMCB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for IMCB, currently valued at 2.85, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.85
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for IMCB, currently valued at 3.99, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.99
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for IMCB, currently valued at 1.50, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.50
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for IMCB, currently valued at 2.30, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.30
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for IMCB, currently valued at 16.21, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0016.21
VO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VO, currently valued at 2.97, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.97
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VO, currently valued at 4.11, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.004.11
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VO, currently valued at 1.53, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.53
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VO, currently valued at 2.03, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.03
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VO, currently valued at 18.33, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0018.33

IMCB vs. VO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IMCB Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is comparable to the VO Sharpe Ratio of 3.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IMCB and VO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.85
2.97
IMCB
VO

Dividends

IMCB vs. VO - Dividend Comparison

IMCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than VO's 1.45% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
IMCB
iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF
1.37%1.55%1.70%1.08%1.12%1.32%1.80%1.31%1.79%1.47%1.40%1.19%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
1.45%1.52%1.60%1.12%1.45%1.48%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%1.29%1.18%

Drawdowns

IMCB vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IMCB drawdown since its inception was -58.80%, roughly equal to the maximum VO drawdown of -58.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IMCB and VO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-6.00%-5.00%-4.00%-3.00%-2.00%-1.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.62%
0
IMCB
VO

Volatility

IMCB vs. VO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 3.75%. This indicates that IMCB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.99%
3.75%
IMCB
VO