MDT vs. KMB
MDT (Medtronic plc) and KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) are both stocks. MDT operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare), while KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, MDT returned 2.24%/yr vs 1.37%/yr for KMB. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MDT vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDT achieves a -11.80% return, which is significantly lower than KMB's 10.35% return. Over the past 10 years, MDT has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 2.24%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 1.37% annualized return.
MDT
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- 6M
- -12.44%
- YTD
- -11.80%
- 1Y
- -4.03%
- 3Y*
- 1.10%
- 5Y*
- -5.17%
- 10Y*
- 2.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.23%
KMB
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 5.77%
- 6M
- 12.09%
- YTD
- 10.35%
- 1Y
- -10.77%
- 3Y*
- -3.71%
- 5Y*
- -0.61%
- 10Y*
- 1.37%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.89%
MDT vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDT Medtronic plc | -11.80% | 24.05% | 0.28% | 9.58% | -22.55% | -9.79% | 5.70% | 27.34% | 15.18% | 15.90% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 10.35% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDT and KMB is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 1984 | 0.27 |
Fundamentals
MDT:
$106.62B
KMB:
$36.01B
MDT:
$3.73
KMB:
$5.93
MDT:
22.34
KMB:
18.30
MDT:
11.61
KMB:
3.16
MDT:
2.95
KMB:
2.19
MDT:
2.17
KMB:
20.13
MDT:
$36.36B
KMB:
$16.54B
MDT:
$23.64B
KMB:
$5.93B
MDT:
$9.72B
KMB:
$3.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDT vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
MDT
KMB
MDT vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Medtronic plc (MDT) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MDT | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 0.95 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.14 | -0.37 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.30 | -0.54 | +0.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MDT vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDT drawdown since its inception was -57.63%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDT and KMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDT | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.63% | -36.97% | -20.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.90% | -29.60% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.90% | -34.06% | +5.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.10% | -34.06% | -11.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.10% | -34.06% | -11.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.93% | -22.08% | -5.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.57% | -8.88% | -7.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.24% | 20.10% | -6.86% |
Volatility
MDT vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
Medtronic plc (MDT) has a higher volatility of 10.04% compared to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) at 8.95%. This indicates that MDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDT | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.04% | 8.95% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.91% | 18.53% | +0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.34% | 27.01% | -3.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.34% | 20.57% | +1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.45% | 21.23% | +2.22% |
Dividends
MDT vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
MDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than KMB's 4.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.68% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
MDT Medtronic plc | 3.42% | 2.95% | 3.49% | 3.34% | 3.44% | 2.39% | 1.95% | 1.87% | 2.15% | 2.24% | 2.34% | 1.88% |
Financials
MDT vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Medtronic plc and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
MDT vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison
MDT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Medtronic plc reported a gross profit of 7.44B and revenue of 9.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.9%.
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
MDT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Medtronic plc reported an operating income of 1.56B and revenue of 9.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.0%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
MDT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Medtronic plc reported a net income of 1.24B and revenue of 9.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.7%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
MDT and KMB have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDT has higher volatility (10.04%) compared to KMB (8.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDT dropped -57.63% vs KMB's -36.97%.
MDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.17 vs -0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDT and KMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer