MDT vs. KMB
MDT (Medtronic plc) and KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) are both stocks. MDT operates in Medical Devices (Healthcare), while KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, MDT returned 2.04%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for KMB. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MDT vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDT achieves a -15.31% return, which is significantly lower than KMB's -0.57% return. Over the past 10 years, MDT has outperformed KMB with an annualized return of 2.04%, while KMB has yielded a comparatively lower 0.60% annualized return.
MDT
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 5.96%
- YTD
- -15.31%
- 6M
- -19.07%
- 1Y
- -4.79%
- 3Y*
- 2.04%
- 5Y*
- -5.25%
- 10Y*
- 2.04%
KMB
- 1D
- -1.30%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- YTD
- -0.57%
- 6M
- -1.51%
- 1Y
- -23.22%
- 3Y*
- -6.39%
- 5Y*
- -1.75%
- 10Y*
- 0.60%
MDT vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDT Medtronic plc | -15.31% | 24.05% | 0.28% | 9.58% | -22.55% | -9.79% | 5.70% | 27.34% | 15.18% | 15.90% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | -0.57% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 9.66% | 0.95% | 24.57% | -2.06% | 9.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between MDT and KMB is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 1984 | 0.27 |
Fundamentals
MDT:
$103.94B
KMB:
$32.57B
MDT:
$3.58
KMB:
$5.93
MDT:
22.52
KMB:
16.49
MDT:
2.03
KMB:
2.85
MDT:
2.93
KMB:
1.97
MDT:
$35.48B
KMB:
$16.54B
MDT:
$5.78B
KMB:
$5.93B
MDT:
$7.11B
KMB:
$3.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDT vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
MDT
KMB
MDT vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Medtronic plc (MDT) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDT | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 0.84 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.17 | -0.79 | +0.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.43 | -1.21 | +0.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDT | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 | -0.91 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | -0.09 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 | 0.03 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.46 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
MDT vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDT drawdown since its inception was -57.63%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDT and KMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDT | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.63% | -36.97% | -20.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.90% | -29.60% | +0.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.90% | -34.06% | +5.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.10% | -34.06% | -11.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.10% | -34.06% | -11.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.81% | -29.78% | -1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.54% | -8.84% | -7.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.17% | 19.23% | -8.06% |
Volatility
MDT vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
Medtronic plc (MDT) has a higher volatility of 10.04% compared to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) at 8.66%. This indicates that MDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MDT | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.04% | 8.66% | +1.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.19% | 16.47% | -0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.95% | 25.63% | -4.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.93% | 20.15% | +1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.24% | 21.06% | +2.18% |
Dividends
MDT vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
MDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, less than KMB's 5.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 5.20% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
MDT Medtronic plc | 3.52% | 2.95% | 3.49% | 3.34% | 3.44% | 2.39% | 1.95% | 1.87% | 2.15% | 2.24% | 2.34% | 1.88% |
Financials
MDT vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Medtronic plc and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
MDT and KMB have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDT has higher volatility (10.04%) compared to KMB (8.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDT dropped -57.63% vs KMB's -36.97%.
MDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.23 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for MDT and KMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer