MDT vs. JNJ
Compare and contrast key facts about Medtronic plc (MDT) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MDT or JNJ.
Correlation
The correlation between MDT and JNJ is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
MDT vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MDT:
0.44
JNJ:
0.60
MDT:
0.72
JNJ:
0.93
MDT:
1.10
JNJ:
1.13
MDT:
0.25
JNJ:
0.66
MDT:
1.51
JNJ:
1.82
MDT:
6.18%
JNJ:
6.29%
MDT:
21.36%
JNJ:
18.53%
MDT:
-57.63%
JNJ:
-52.60%
MDT:
-29.48%
JNJ:
-8.30%
Fundamentals
MDT:
$107.17B
JNJ:
$371.64B
MDT:
$3.28
JNJ:
$8.99
MDT:
25.48
JNJ:
17.18
MDT:
1.46
JNJ:
1.06
MDT:
3.23
JNJ:
4.21
MDT:
2.20
JNJ:
4.80
MDT:
$24.61B
JNJ:
$89.33B
MDT:
$15.68B
JNJ:
$61.01B
MDT:
$6.89B
JNJ:
$34.70B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDT achieves a 7.06% return, which is significantly lower than JNJ's 8.82% return. Over the past 10 years, MDT has underperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 3.84%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively higher 7.56% annualized return.
MDT
7.06%
-4.51%
-4.23%
8.40%
0.59%
3.84%
JNJ
8.82%
0.49%
-0.94%
7.48%
3.92%
7.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MDT vs. JNJ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
MDT
JNJ
MDT vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Medtronic plc (MDT) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MDT vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison
MDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, more than JNJ's 3.18% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDT Medtronic plc | 3.30% | 3.49% | 3.34% | 3.44% | 2.39% | 1.95% | 1.87% | 2.15% | 2.24% | 2.34% | 1.88% | 1.66% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 3.18% | 3.40% | 3.00% | 2.52% | 2.45% | 2.53% | 2.57% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.87% | 2.64% |
Drawdowns
MDT vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDT drawdown since its inception was -57.63%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -52.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDT and JNJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MDT vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison
Medtronic plc (MDT) has a higher volatility of 9.29% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 7.24%. This indicates that MDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MDT vs. JNJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Medtronic plc and Johnson & Johnson. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities