MDT vs. JNJ
Compare and contrast key facts about Medtronic plc (MDT) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MDT or JNJ.
Correlation
The correlation between MDT and JNJ is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MDT vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MDT:
0.28
JNJ:
0.09
MDT:
0.51
JNJ:
0.25
MDT:
1.07
JNJ:
1.03
MDT:
0.15
JNJ:
0.09
MDT:
1.00
JNJ:
0.25
MDT:
5.58%
JNJ:
6.38%
MDT:
20.13%
JNJ:
18.33%
MDT:
-57.63%
JNJ:
-52.60%
MDT:
-26.15%
JNJ:
-8.74%
Fundamentals
MDT:
$113.97B
JNJ:
$374.39B
MDT:
$3.28
JNJ:
$5.79
MDT:
27.09
JNJ:
26.83
MDT:
1.52
JNJ:
1.04
MDT:
$33.20B
JNJ:
$67.44B
MDT:
$20.88B
JNJ:
$46.48B
MDT:
$9.39B
JNJ:
$19.10B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDT achieves a 12.12% return, which is significantly higher than JNJ's 8.29% return. Over the past 10 years, MDT has underperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 4.05%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively higher 7.49% annualized return.
MDT
12.12%
-5.02%
1.37%
7.82%
3.54%
4.05%
JNJ
8.29%
-7.13%
-2.05%
1.66%
5.93%
7.49%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MDT vs. JNJ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
MDT
JNJ
MDT vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Medtronic plc (MDT) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MDT vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison
MDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, less than JNJ's 3.19% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDT Medtronic plc | 3.15% | 3.49% | 3.34% | 3.44% | 2.39% | 1.95% | 1.87% | 2.15% | 2.24% | 2.34% | 1.88% | 1.66% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 3.19% | 3.40% | 3.00% | 2.52% | 2.45% | 2.53% | 2.57% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.87% | 2.64% |
Drawdowns
MDT vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDT drawdown since its inception was -57.63%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -52.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDT and JNJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MDT vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Medtronic plc (MDT) is 5.24%, while Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) has a volatility of 8.81%. This indicates that MDT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MDT vs. JNJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Medtronic plc and Johnson & Johnson. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities