MDT vs. JNJ
Compare and contrast key facts about Medtronic plc (MDT) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: MDT or JNJ.
Correlation
The correlation between MDT and JNJ is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
MDT vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
MDT:
0.50
JNJ:
-0.14
MDT:
0.83
JNJ:
-0.09
MDT:
1.10
JNJ:
0.99
MDT:
0.25
JNJ:
-0.13
MDT:
1.47
JNJ:
-0.32
MDT:
6.28%
JNJ:
7.06%
MDT:
18.63%
JNJ:
16.20%
MDT:
-57.63%
JNJ:
-52.60%
MDT:
-24.63%
JNJ:
-11.92%
Fundamentals
MDT:
$118.56B
JNJ:
$368.10B
MDT:
$3.27
JNJ:
$5.78
MDT:
28.28
JNJ:
26.45
MDT:
1.54
JNJ:
0.93
MDT:
$33.00B
JNJ:
$66.30B
MDT:
$20.67B
JNJ:
$45.96B
MDT:
$9.19B
JNJ:
$22.61B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDT achieves a 14.43% return, which is significantly higher than JNJ's 4.52% return. Over the past 10 years, MDT has underperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 5.08%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively higher 7.14% annualized return.
MDT
14.43%
14.82%
15.70%
8.69%
-1.82%
5.08%
JNJ
4.52%
5.45%
-2.74%
-1.79%
3.14%
7.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
MDT vs. JNJ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
MDT
JNJ
MDT vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Medtronic plc (MDT) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
MDT vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison
MDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, less than JNJ's 3.25% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDT Medtronic plc | 3.05% | 3.49% | 3.34% | 3.44% | 2.39% | 1.95% | 1.87% | 2.15% | 2.24% | 2.34% | 1.88% | 1.66% |
JNJ Johnson & Johnson | 3.25% | 3.40% | 3.00% | 2.52% | 2.45% | 2.53% | 2.57% | 2.74% | 2.38% | 2.73% | 2.87% | 2.64% |
Drawdowns
MDT vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDT drawdown since its inception was -57.63%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -52.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDT and JNJ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
MDT vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison
Medtronic plc (MDT) has a higher volatility of 7.34% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 6.81%. This indicates that MDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
MDT vs. JNJ - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Medtronic plc and Johnson & Johnson. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities