MDT vs. ABT
Compare and contrast key facts about Medtronic plc (MDT) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT).
Performance
MDT vs. ABT - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
MDT vs. ABT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDT Medtronic plc | -9.06% | 24.05% | 0.28% | 9.58% | -22.55% | -9.79% | 5.70% | 27.34% | 15.18% | 15.90% |
ABT Abbott Laboratories | -17.64% | 12.87% | 4.81% | 2.26% | -20.68% | 30.53% | 28.04% | 22.08% | 29.06% | 52.03% |
Fundamentals
MDT:
$111.62B
ABT:
$179.36B
MDT:
$3.58
ABT:
$3.73
MDT:
24.18
ABT:
27.52
MDT:
2.18
ABT:
1.72
MDT:
3.14
ABT:
4.05
MDT:
$35.48B
ABT:
$44.33B
MDT:
$5.78B
ABT:
$24.61B
MDT:
$7.11B
ABT:
$11.33B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MDT achieves a -9.06% return, which is significantly higher than ABT's -17.64% return. Over the past 10 years, MDT has underperformed ABT with an annualized return of 4.10%, while ABT has yielded a comparatively higher 11.37% annualized return.
MDT
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- -10.55%
- YTD
- -9.06%
- 6M
- -7.60%
- 1Y
- -0.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.82%
- 5Y*
- -3.11%
- 10Y*
- 4.10%
ABT
- 1D
- 0.78%
- 1M
- -11.76%
- YTD
- -17.64%
- 6M
- -22.62%
- 1Y
- -21.15%
- 3Y*
- 2.45%
- 5Y*
- -1.11%
- 10Y*
- 11.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MDT vs. ABT — Risk / Return Rank
MDT
ABT
MDT vs. ABT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Medtronic plc (MDT) and Abbott Laboratories (ABT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| MDT | ABT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | -0.92 | +0.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.11 | -1.12 | +1.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 0.84 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.11 | -0.80 | +0.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.32 | -2.02 | +2.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MDT | ABT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 | -0.92 | +0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | -0.05 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.48 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.41 | +0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between MDT and ABT is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
MDT vs. ABT - Dividend Comparison
MDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, more than ABT's 2.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MDT Medtronic plc | 3.28% | 2.95% | 3.49% | 3.34% | 3.44% | 2.39% | 1.95% | 1.87% | 2.15% | 2.24% | 2.34% | 1.88% |
ABT Abbott Laboratories | 2.34% | 1.88% | 1.95% | 1.85% | 1.71% | 1.28% | 1.32% | 1.47% | 1.55% | 1.86% | 2.71% | 2.14% |
Drawdowns
MDT vs. ABT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MDT drawdown since its inception was -57.63%, roughly equal to the maximum ABT drawdown of -55.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDT and ABT.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| MDT | ABT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.63% | -55.57% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.61% | -25.18% | +7.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.10% | -33.88% | -11.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.10% | -33.88% | -11.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.69% | -25.41% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.48% | -14.29% | -2.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.27% | 9.94% | -3.67% |
Volatility
MDT vs. ABT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Medtronic plc (MDT) is 5.55%, while Abbott Laboratories (ABT) has a volatility of 5.95%. This indicates that MDT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ABT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| MDT | ABT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.55% | 5.95% | -0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.84% | 16.83% | -2.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.72% | 23.14% | -2.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 21.98% | -0.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.00% | 23.57% | -0.57% |
Financials
MDT vs. ABT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Medtronic plc and Abbott Laboratories. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities