MDIV vs. EAOA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

MDIV (First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund) and EAOA (iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds - MDIV tracks the NASDAQ US Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index while EAOA tracks the BlackRock ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MDIV returned 5.65%/yr vs 8.52%/yr for EAOA. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MDIV charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EAOA.

Performance

MDIV vs. EAOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDIV achieves a 7.68% return, which is significantly lower than EAOA's 9.93% return.

MDIV

• 1D: -0.65%
• 1M: 0.10%
• YTD: 7.68%
• 6M: 7.38%
• 1Y: 11.03%
• 3Y*: 11.41%
• 5Y*: 5.65%
• 10Y*: 4.66%

EAOA

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: 4.36%
• YTD: 9.93%
• 6M: 10.44%
• 1Y: 24.37%
• 3Y*: 17.20%
• 5Y*: 8.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDIV vs. EAOA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MDIV First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund	7.68%	3.77%	10.05%	11.50%	-3.86%	16.51%	8.33%
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF	9.93%	18.41%	13.79%	18.27%	-17.76%	14.52%	19.79%

Correlation

The correlation between MDIV and EAOA is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2020	0.64

The correlation between MDIV and EAOA shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

MDIV vs. EAOA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	MDIV	EAOA
Financial Services	22.4%	13.5%
Real Estate	21.6%	1.6%
Energy	17.6%	3.0%
Utilities	9.6%	2.3%
Consumer Defensive	8.0%	3.7%
Communication Services	3.2%	7.3%
Consumer Cyclical	3.2%	7.7%
Healthcare	1.6%	6.8%
Industrials	1.6%	9.0%
Basic Materials	0.7%	2.4%
Technology	-	28.9%

Return for Risk

MDIV vs. EAOA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDIV

MDIV Risk / Return Rank: 52
MDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
MDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
MDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 45
MDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
MDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 53

EAOA

EAOA Risk / Return Rank: 68
EAOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
EAOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
EAOA Omega Ratio Rank: 68
EAOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
EAOA Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDIV vs. EAOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV) and iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MDIV	EAOA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	2.28	-0.63
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	3.21	-0.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.41	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.27	3.00	+0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.10	13.30	-4.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MDIV vs. EAOA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the EAOA Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDIV and EAOA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MDIV	EAOA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.65	2.28	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	0.65	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.93	-0.58

Drawdowns

MDIV vs. EAOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDIV drawdown since its inception was -48.50%, which is greater than EAOA's maximum drawdown of -25.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDIV and EAOA.

Drawdown Indicators

	MDIV	EAOA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.50%	-25.06%	-23.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.39%	-8.17%	+4.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.62%	-13.84%	+4.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.02%	-25.06%	+12.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.14%	-0.71%	-0.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.58%	-5.31%	+0.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.22%	1.84%	-0.62%

Volatility

MDIV vs. EAOA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV) is 1.62%, while iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF (EAOA) has a volatility of 3.39%. This indicates that MDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MDIV	EAOA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.62%	3.39%	-1.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.32%	8.64%	-4.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.71%	10.75%	-4.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.93%	13.25%	-2.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.23%	13.14%	+2.09%

MDIV vs. EAOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDIV has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than EAOA's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

MDIV vs. EAOA - Dividend Comparison

MDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.39%, more than EAOA's 1.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EAOA iShares ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation ETF	1.95%	2.10%	2.09%	2.21%	1.93%	1.48%	1.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MDIV First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund	6.39%	6.51%	6.40%	6.08%	6.71%	5.30%	6.00%	5.90%	6.76%	6.04%	6.35%	7.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MDIV and EAOA in my portfolio?

MDIV and EAOA have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MDIV or EAOA?

EAOA has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to MDIV (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDIV dropped -48.50% vs EAOA's -25.06%.

Which ETF is better, MDIV or EAOA?

On 5-year performance, EAOA leads with 8.52% vs 5.65% for MDIV. On fees, EAOA is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, MDIV has been the lower-risk option at 1.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MDIV or EAOA?

Over the 5-year period, EAOA has performed better with a 8.52% return vs 5.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MDIV or EAOA?

EAOA is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for MDIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MDIV or EAOA?

MDIV has the higher dividend yield at 6.39%, compared with 1.95% for EAOA.

What is the main difference between MDIV and EAOA?

MDIV tracks NASDAQ US Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index, while EAOA tracks BlackRock ESG Aware Aggressive Allocation Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for MDIV and 0.18% for EAOA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EAOA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.