MDIV vs. HNDL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

MDIV (First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund) and HNDL (Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds - MDIV tracks the NASDAQ US Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index while HNDL tracks the NASDAQ 7 HANDL™ Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, MDIV returned 5.93%/yr vs 4.77%/yr for HNDL. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MDIV charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for HNDL.

Performance

MDIV vs. HNDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV) and Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF (HNDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MDIV achieves a 8.23% return, which is significantly higher than HNDL's 6.62% return.

MDIV

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -0.63%
• YTD: 8.23%
• 6M: 8.54%
• 1Y: 11.46%
• 3Y*: 12.22%
• 5Y*: 5.93%
• 10Y*: 4.86%

HNDL

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -0.34%
• YTD: 6.62%
• 6M: 6.43%
• 1Y: 14.43%
• 3Y*: 11.67%
• 5Y*: 4.77%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MDIV vs. HNDL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MDIV First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund	8.23%	3.77%	10.05%	11.50%	-3.86%	16.51%	-14.84%	18.59%	-7.05%
HNDL Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF	6.62%	10.76%	10.66%	13.28%	-19.12%	9.06%	12.03%	15.66%	-5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between MDIV and HNDL is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2018	0.59

The correlation between MDIV and HNDL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MDIV vs. HNDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MDIV

MDIV Risk / Return Rank: 57
MDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
MDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
MDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 49
MDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
MDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 56

HNDL

HNDL Risk / Return Rank: 62
HNDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
HNDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
HNDL Omega Ratio Rank: 61
HNDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
HNDL Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MDIV vs. HNDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV) and Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF (HNDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	MDIV	HNDL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	1.90	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.46	2.63	-0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.35	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.39	2.92	+0.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.38	11.88	-2.49

MDIV vs. HNDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MDIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the HNDL Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MDIV and HNDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

MDIV vs. HNDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MDIV drawdown since its inception was -48.50%, which is greater than HNDL's maximum drawdown of -23.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MDIV and HNDL.

Drawdown Indicators

	MDIV	HNDL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.50%	-23.72%	-24.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.39%	-4.96%	+1.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.62%	-12.25%	+2.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.02%	-23.72%	+10.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.05%	-0.77%	-0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.57%	-4.84%	+0.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.22%	1.22%	0.00%

Volatility

MDIV vs. HNDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund (MDIV) is 2.17%, while Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF (HNDL) has a volatility of 2.68%. This indicates that MDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HNDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MDIV	HNDL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.17%	2.68%	-0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.51%	5.94%	-1.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.81%	7.63%	-0.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.94%	11.55%	-0.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.22%	10.74%	+4.48%

MDIV vs. HNDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

MDIV has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than HNDL's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

MDIV vs. HNDL - Dividend Comparison

MDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.35%, less than HNDL's 6.89% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HNDL Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7HANDL Index ETF	6.89%	6.86%	7.02%	6.78%	7.87%	6.86%	6.21%	5.27%	6.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MDIV First Trust Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index Fund	6.35%	6.51%	6.40%	6.08%	6.71%	5.30%	6.00%	5.90%	6.76%	6.04%	6.35%	7.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MDIV and HNDL in my portfolio?

MDIV and HNDL have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MDIV or HNDL?

HNDL has higher volatility (2.68%) compared to MDIV (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MDIV dropped -48.50% vs HNDL's -23.72%.

Which ETF is better, MDIV or HNDL?

On 5-year performance, MDIV leads with 5.93% vs 4.77% for HNDL. On fees, MDIV is cheaper at 0.73% per year. On volatility, MDIV has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MDIV or HNDL?

Over the 5-year period, MDIV has performed better with a 5.93% return vs 4.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MDIV or HNDL?

MDIV is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for HNDL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MDIV or HNDL?

HNDL has the higher dividend yield at 6.89%, compared with 6.35% for MDIV.

What is the main difference between MDIV and HNDL?

MDIV tracks NASDAQ US Multi-Asset Diversified Income Index, while HNDL tracks NASDAQ 7 HANDL™ Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Rational Capital LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for MDIV and 0.97% for HNDL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HNDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.